Dave Morris of Ramblers Scotland will be representing the concerns of many Scots interested in the preservation of wild land when he objects to the over-development of onshore wind turbines and power lines (Letters, January 19).
However, in turning his fire on UK Government policy it is he who is focused on the wrong target.
While overall energy policy is indeed reserved to Westminster, competence for the banding of the Renewables Obligation – the subsidy Mr Morris refers to – is devolved to Scottish Ministers. So, if the subsidy regime needs to change to divert more money to support offshore wind, wave and tidal development, then it is Scottish, not UK, ministers who have the power to do that.
Moreover, the setting of renewable energy targets and planning policy are both matters for the Scottish Parliament, and it is the SNP's target of 100% electricity from renewable sources by 2020 which is driving the current expansion in onshore wind. The Scottish Parliament's Economy, Energy & Tourism Committee, which I convene, will shortly be conducting an inquiry into the achievability of this target.
SNP planning policy seems to be focused on granting consent to large numbers of onshore wind turbines. We regularly see wind farm developments rejected by local planning committees, consisting of democratically elected local representatives, but then granted on appeal to Scottish Ministers in the teeth of vigorous opposition.
Murdo Fraser MSP, Scottish Conservative, Mid-Scotland & Fife,
The Scottish Parliament,
Edinburgh.
I have to agree with Dave Morris. The UK Government is indeed primarily responsible for the crazy financial incentives which encourage the energy companies to plaster our hills with wind turbines and power lines. These subsidies need to be scrapped.
UK energy policy is a reserved matter, but if the Scottish Government had any real wish to bring a halt to the damaging onslaught upon Scotland's world-renowned landscape by wind farm developers, it has the means to do so as planning is a devolved matter. It has chosen not to do so.
Since May 2007 the Scottish Government has determined 57 energy applications, including approval for 48 new renewable and four non-renewable projects since May 2007. Another 35 applications (29 onshore wind, two hydro, four bio/thermal and one coal) are currently being processed.
It has also set a target of meeting the equivalent of 100% of electricity demand from renewables by 2020. With tidal and wave generation in its infancy, and offshore remaining eye-wateringly costly to the private investor, construction of industrial scale onshore wind by mainly foreign-owned companies, in large part paid for by the consumer and the taxpayer by means of subsidy and the public purse, remains the only truly viable option available as a possible means of achieving that aim.
So let no-one be duped into thinking the SNP Scottish Government is somehow less culpable than any other political party of destroying Scotland's greatest asset – her landscape – and selling Scotland short in this chasing of the renewable rainbow.
Neil McKinnon,
Tulchan Garden,
Glenalmond,
Perth.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article