AS a chorister of long standing I hesitate to intrude on the debate on your Letters Pages (November 27, 29, 30, and December 1, 3, 4, & 5) but there seems to have been a palpable hush from the musical and theological hierarchy of the Church of Scotland which I find strange.
I was one of those who sang the Dream of Gerontius in the Bute Hall. This was a mainly secular amateur choir and a secular orchestra of mixed professionals and amateurs doing a performance to honour an eminent churchman and to add some encouragement to Joan Dillon's enterprise.
Those of us who sing in church choirs attached to the Church of Scotland have undergone a succession of musical compilations recently all of which have been trying to popularise singing within the act of worship. I find it puzzling that there has been no attempt to do a bit of joined-up thinking here. No-one seems to have addressed the basic problem which is that singing as a skill seems to be no longer taught as a matter of course in schools. Harmony or part singing, as distinct from unison, appears to be beyond the abilities of most people yet I can remember the full-bodied part singing of the old Scottish Psalms and Paraphrases and the enjoyment of that deep participation. Then we had CH3 (Church Hymnary No.3) and a lot of new unison music appeared only to be followed by CH4 which went even further down that line. Those who are not members of the Church of Scotland might find it strange that a goodly number of the hymns in CH4 are either arranged or composed by the convener of the committee that selected the contents.
I confess that I find it difficult to hear better singing in churches today than in the past in spite of all the modernisation and I can only hope that someday there will be a recognition that music, of whatever kind, has to be taught at the ground level and then there might be something to improve upon within the constraints of the liturgy.
Tony Brooke,
9 Campbell Drive, Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article