I NOTE with interest the views of your correspondent Andrew Reid on the principles behind the welfare state (Letters, October 6).
We have heard David Cameron in the past orating about The Big Society, albeit somewhat amorphous in form. He has been more reticent about his vision in recent times. Last month we had Johann Lamont calling for a review of state-funded disbursements essentially on the basis of affordability. I believe that she has come in for much unwarranted criticism from certain quarters in seeking to establish in these straitened times a better understanding of what can be reasonably expended from state coffers. Last week we had David Miliband stepping out at the Labour Party conference with his somewhat skeletal concept of One Nation.
In all this debate we do well to recall the Beveridge Report being the origin of the post-Second World War social reform, which we know as the welfare state. That report described Five Giant Evils within UK society – Squalor, Ignorance, Want, Idleness, and Disease. In all these areas clearly much has been done by way of amelioration. Much, however, remains to be done and accordingly much is still expected of the state through the taxpayer. I would suggest that we bear in mind the words of Churchill in 1943 (albeit he lost favour subsequently with the electorate at the General Election in 1945) when he cautioned against imposing "great new expenditure on the state without any relation to the circumstances which might prevail at the time".
In this context I fear that in a number of areas, such as the indiscriminate availability of free bus passes and winter fuel payments to all over 60, it is a question of trying to lock the stable door after the horse has bolted.
Ian W Thomson,
38 Kirkintilloch Road, Lenzie.
WHEN is a freebie not a freebie? When it has already been paid for through taxation. Charging people for their medicine would be a further tax on people who are ill, and children should be able to go to university without having to worry about the financial consequences for their families.
I can't say I've noticed many OAPs sitting on buses dripping with diamonds and pearls, but most of those pensioners who do use their bus passes, and those who receive "free" personal care, lived through the hard times of the Second World War, many of them either directly serving their country, or with fathers or brothers who fought in the war, and in some cases never came home. People who have made these sacrifices, and have worked all their lives, should be thanked for their contribution, not made to feel that they are on the receiving end of hand-outs and charity.
It is a disgrace that in today's oil-rich Scotland some politicians should be so poverty-stricken in standards, ambitions and ideals that they could even contemplate slapping charges on people who require health care, and on children who aspire to a university education.
Ruth Marr,
99 Grampian Road,
Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article