EWAN Hoyle is right to rail at our politicians' failure to properly address the ruin and destruction caused by drugs (Letters, July 8).
He should do so not because they have failed to engage in debate but because they have refused to allocate the resources required to meet the challenges presented by widescale drug abuse.
Compared with the many tens of billions of pounds spent on nuclear weapons and on foreign wars, the sum spent on providing local communities with the means to minimise the social conditions which so often lead to drug abuse and to provide real, lasting support for those who have fallen victim is pitiful.
The Government, nonetheless, is right to resist the call to establish a legal and regulated drug market. In principle, it is always wrong to enact a policy which will directly destroy and take away lives. Also, from a pragmatic point of view, such a policy could never work. The criminal drug barons would fight back by selling to a wider spectrum of client-victims, offering wares manufactured out of cheap, adulterated and increasingly toxic forms of drugs.
Conversely, the Government will be obliged to go to great lengths and expense to open and run laboratories and provide secure transport of goods to a large number of approved outlets, using at all times high- grade and expensive chemical ingredients.
The Government is faced with large numbers of the population addicted to tobacco and dependent on alcohol, with all that entails. Such drugs are legal because the Government recognises the futility of trying to ban such drugs through legislation.
The US experiment with Prohibition has much to teach us. This understanding has led to the existing legal status of tobacco and alcohol and, more importantly, the educational drive (greatly under-funded) to minimise the consumption of these drugs.
So-called recreational drugs should remain illegal as to do otherwise would undermine our efforts to reduce all forms of drug abuse, including tobacco and alcohol. It would also allow politicians to overlook, ignore or even deny the very real social and economic ailments which in so many cases leads to drug taking in the first place.
Christopher Gilfedder,
91 Langbar Crescent.
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article