I READ with interest your article on the announcement of the annual Scottish Carbuncle Awards, with the recipient this year being Aberdeen ("Row over gardens plan sees Granite City named worst place in urban poll", The Herald, February 3).
Although I appreciate that these awards are meant to help stimulate debate and discussion on the quality of places across Scotland, the focus on the negatives does not help. No place should be labelled as a carbuncle, but rather we should be looking to build on good practice and celebrate our new iconic buildings. Indeed, last year the Royal Town Planning Institute did this very thing through our Scotland's Best Places initiative which asked the public to put forward ideas on those places they cherished and which had been created, enhanced or protected by planners over the last 100 years.
This generated interest from across Scotland with a wide range of places being put forward from Shetland to Dumfries. People were proud of regeneration projects such the Dundee Waterfront, the Gorbals, Lerwick Waterfront, Glasgow's Merchant City and Raploch; the conservation of Edinburgh's Royal Mile; our new towns such as East Kilbride; the reinvention of the Forth and Clyde Canal; and rural places including the West Highland Way and Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park.
As the "place profession" planners constantly strive to reach these high standards but often face challenges in convincing politicians, investors, developers and communities of the need to invest in quality and to take a long term view. Given this, if we want to ensure that all of our cities, towns and villages are inspiring places we need to invest in places, planning and quality.
Pam Ewen,
Convenor, Royal Town Planning Institute Scotland,
18 Atholl Crescent, Edinburgh
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article