Having written on the subject before, I awaited what I thought would be a torrent of protests at the news that schools are losing the vast majority of their foreign language assistants ("Schools lose four in five foreign language helpers", The Herald, November 14).
I don’t know whether the lack of printed responses until Alasdair Sutherland’s reply (Letters, November 18) indicates apathy or despair.
I agree with what Mr Sutherland says, but would also highlight the commercial and economic myopia which allows the quality and aspirations of foreign language teaching to decline.
Your report says the Scottish Government wants Scottish pupils “to learn at least two languages as well as their mother tongue”. This looks like raising the bar so high that no-one will realistically expect any real progress.
The investment should be in introducing foreign language learning (FLL) into the primary curriculum, where songs, little poems and the like could play a significant role in tuning the infant ear to the new sounds; the enthusiasm (I hope) generated by the inter-active approach before the self-consciousness of puberty might encourage more children to keep on FLL into the senior school.
The rigorous teaching of English grammar, including the terms which are common to most European languages (parts of speech, etc.), would simplify the transition from rationalising English syntax on the that of the foreign languages.
At a time when the possibility of Scottish independence is being debated, it ill behoves a small country to delude itself that its inability to provide a large cohort offoreign-language speakers will allow it to flourish.
Remember Willy Brandt: “If I want to sell to you, I will speak English; but if you want to sell to me, dann müssen Sie Deutsch sprechen.”
Christopher Frew,
320 Leith Walk,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article