DR Ken Brown (Letters, June 26), asks why Fergus Ewing has gone back on his claim that "the SNP believe that many other forms of renewable energy are the future, not unconstrained wind farms".
I don't suppose he would want to admit it, but the answer just might be that it is an extremely effective way of transferring extra funds from non-Scottish electricity consumers to Scottish communities without people outside Scotland realising what is happening.
The cost to the UK public of the now near-standard payment of Community Benefit recommended by the Scottish Government is £5.000 per MW per year for 25 years. This amount has to be paid by wind turbine operators to local communities and is recovered from the public by an "add-on" to UK consumers' electricity bills.
It should be borne in mind that 91.62 per cent of the UK population (2011 census) live outside Scotland and Scotland has by far the greatest proportion of onshore wind turbines. Based on population rather than the unknown total electricity billing, this means that for every 3MW turbine in Scotland there is a Community Benefit payment paid to Scottish communities from outside Scotland of £343,575 during the lifetime of the turbine. Multiply that up and it is a very substantial hidden additional payment to us in Scotland.
Nigel Willis,
Nervelstone, Lochwinnoch.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article