The eat local movement has well and truly taken root, and I hear that at least one supermarket is contemplating the establishment of a "wild eating" foraged food range.
Which makes it all the more perplexing that bread remains one of the most dislocated parts of our diet.
The vast majority of the wheat in commercially made bread is imported from Canada, the United States, Russia and Germany. Not only that, but the method used in commercial breadmaking, introduced in 1961 by the British Baking Industries Research Association and still used today, is as far removed from traditional slow-fermentation Scottish breadmaking as it's possible to be. Some 80 per cent of bread bought in shops and supermarkets eliminates the need for fermentation because it takes too long and contains instead a mix of additives to speed up the process, create artificial volume and prolong shelf life. These breads are thought by a growing number of people to contribute to coeliac disease and gluten intolerance.
When I first met Andrew Whitley of Bread Matters in Lamancha, West Linton, two years ago, he was hopeful - against the odds and despite the sneers of the naysayers - of re-establishing a supply of the high-quality, nutritious wheat that in the 19th century grew in abundance in the east of Scotland, was milled and baked locally, and produced bread rich in nutrients and minerals. An imperative for Whitley was to reconnect farmers, millers, bakers, public health nutritionists and consumers, and hand back control of their bread to them.
Tests on last year's first trial crops, grown with support from the James Hutton Institute in Aberdeen, confirmed the heritage wheat contained more nutrients and minerals than modern varieties. Whitley is soon to embark on a second trial of 13 heritage grain varieties with such wonderful names as Golden Drop, Blood Red, Red Lamoth and Shirref's Bearded Red in sites at Mungoswells in East Lothian, Craibstone Estate in Aberdeenshire and Macbiehill in the Borders. (Serendipitously, Mungoswells is where Patrick Shirref bred grains in the 19th century.)
Sowing begins next month and the potential yield from all 13 varieties is one tonne on just one site, so - all being well - there will be enough Scottish bread-quality wheat for independent bakers around the country to launch the Scotland the Bread loaf by this time next year, just in time to make it into the Year of Food and Drink 2015. Whitley's calling it a "second homecoming" of the indigenous wheat grains: when Scotland was a centre of wheat breeding of great importance, it exported them to the New World. They're now grown in the Czech Republic, Poland, Germany and Denmark.
The really exciting thing for Whitley is the potential for this project to be part of Horizon 2020, the biggest EU research and innovation programme ever with almost €80 billion of funding available over seven years from this year. Scottish bread-quality wheat will produce lower yields of better-quality flour that contains more iron, zinc, magnesium and calcium than mass-produced flour, but Whitley reckons the momentum is on his side, as people realise "we can't squeeze any more out of the soil".
The big challenge, though, is getting the wider public to accept the bread this wheat produces: slow fermentation sourdough isn't soft, snow-white, pre-sliced and packed in a plastic bag. Whitley insists sourdough is the breadmaking model of the future, just as it was in the past. It's the simplest method, being followed by generations of people who made it this way at home for centuries.
"All toxic elements of commercial bread can be got rid of, and we will be doing ourselves a favour in the process," he says. "If we insist on only eating light, woolly bread then we get what we ask for: loss of control over who makes our bread and what's in it. And much bellyache."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article