Greenpeace activists protesting against a shipment of nuclear waste on its way to Sellafield are putting themselves at risk of death or injury, the UK nuclear security chief has warned.
Roger Brunt, the director of the government's Office for Civil Nuclear Security (OCNS), has accused the international anti-nuclear group of "recklessness" during attempts to board a boat carrying plutonium-contaminated waste from Sweden.
But Greenpeace insisted that its volunteers were "highly trained" and abided by rigorous safety procedures. The dangers they were trying to prevent were far greater than any they might have caused, the organisation argued.
The OCNS is the secretive government agency responsible for regulating security at 32 civil nuclear sites in the UK, including Dounreay, Torness and Hunterston in Scotland. Its 2007-08 annual report was posted online on Friday.
In the report, Brunt recalled the protests against a five-tonne shipment of radioactive waste from Studsvik in Sweden to the Sellafield nuclear complex in Cumbria on October 5 and 6 last year. Three Scandinavian activists were arrested after climbing onto the nuclear cargo ship, the Atlantic Osprey, from inflatables in the Baltic Sea.
Brunt said the protesters "gained a precarious foothold on the outer hull". To prevent injury or loss of life, he said, the crew then took protesters on board.
"Whilst I unreservedly support the democratic right of people to protest peacefully, I must register my concern at the reckless disregard for their own safety shown by the Greenpeace activists," Brunt stated.
Greenpeace strongly defended its protest, pointing out that it had a long history of taking direct action in potentially dangerous situations. "Rigorous safety procedures are always followed and are absolutely central to the planning and execution of our actions," said the group's spokesman, Nathan Argent.
Argent added: "The dangers involved in this unnecessary and irresponsible movement of radioactive material across our seas are, in our opinion, a far greater threat than the actions of a small group of highly trained volunteers."
The action against the Atlantic Osprey was organised by Greenpeace Nordic in Sweden after the organisation failed to win a court ban on the nuclear shipment. Greenpeace UK is barred from taking protest action against shipments to Sellafield by a legal injunction won by the nuclear industry in 1999.
Greenpeace Nordic argued the shipment broke Swedish radiation protection laws but the Swedish government maintained it was a special case as the nuclear waste came from a research reactor.
OCNS plays a vital role in minimising the risks of terrorist attacks on nuclear plants. Its latest annual report, written by Brunt, revealed that it had a budget of £2.5 million and a staff of fewer than 40, including 15 security inspectors.
According to Brunt, there were seven potential breaches of nuclear security reported by site operators in 2007-08. But he gave no details of the nature, timing or location of the incidents, saying: "I am satisfied that the security of nuclear material was not compromised on any of these occasions."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article