PASSENGERS at Scotland's busiest airport appeared confused yesterday after Virgin and BA moved to stop people from travelling who show symptoms of swine flu.
If they are showing classic flu symptoms such as coughs, runny noses, and aching muscles, the passengers must carry a "fit to fly" certificate from their doctor in order to be allowed on the plane.
As holidaymakers at Glasgow Airport prepared to take off for warmer climes, some described it as a worthwhile measure to limit the spread of the H1N1 infection that is sweeping the world. However, other people described it as "scaremongering."
Teacher Marie Wegelin, 52, who lives in Switzerland, but is originally from Bearsden in Glasgow, said: "The media attention the swine flu situation receives in Britain is ridiculous. I say stop the scaremongering and start teaching people basic hygiene."
Advertising executive Alan Donaldson, 42, who is also from Bearsden, but who lives in Sydney, where Virgin and BA fly to and from the UK, said: "It's obviously expensive for me to travel back home. I would be annoyed if they didn't let me board a flight just because I was coughing.
"However, I would also hate to think that I was sitting next to someone all the way to Sydney who had the virus. So it's a Catch-22 situation."
Management consultant Ross Tuffee, 42, from Perth, is certain that the latest news is just the beginning of heightened restrictions on travel as the virus spreads.
He said: "It will inevitably get to the point where the virus is so widespread that these types of restrictions will be necessary. This is the impression I get, although sometimes it's hard to tell how much is just media hype."
Other families with young children, who are among the most vulnerable should they suffer from the virus, are unsure of what steps they should be taking before setting out to the airport.
Civil servant Sharon Collins, 41, from Summerston, Glasgow, said: "My daughter has a cold just now but we know it isn't swine flu. It does make us much more paranoid when travelling because the guidelines are a bit haphazard and we don't know what to do one way or another."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article