Theatre
Endgame
Citizens, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
five stars
TO classify Beckett's second stage masterpiece as "theatre of the absurd" is only useful if we accept that the world we all inhabit boasts a surfeit of such absurdities. Dominic Hill's superb new production for the Citizens and Manchester's HOME appears divorced from "reality" for only as long as it takes Chris Gascoyne's Clov - the only mobile character - to painfully pace out the rusting seam parameters of Tim Piper's container-like set before he utters the first word of the text: "Finished." By then we are in a meticulously delineated stage world the never loosens its grip for an enthralling hour and a half.
That is in large measure achieved through a quartet of superb performances, with David Neilson commanding and vulnerable centre stage as Hamm, making light work of the weightiest monologues, and Peter Kelly and Barbara Rafferty creating full-scale stage-front characters in the bin-bound Nagg and Nell, with their mouthfuls of dreadful teeth, extracting every comic nuance from the text. It is in their references to the Ardennes and Lake Como that a world beyond is acknowledged, and Piper cleverly reflects that in a seaside postcard front cloth that is reduced to a framed painting on the back wall, that has its back turned to us for most of the time. Everything encapsulated in Endgame is measured: the uncertain passage of time, the commitment of one character to another, and the mostly unseen and diminishing supplies of biscuits and medicines - but signinficantly without any scale of values.
Except, of course, the familiar values of the stage itself, where characters aspire to a "loftier misery" and "nothing is funnier than unhappiness". The vaudeville approach to disability, and use of props, particularly the set of steps Clov moves to examine the outside world through the high windows using a brass spyglass and the near-formless three legged stuffed dog he has made for Hamm, exclaim the artifice of the world we are drawn into, where God does "not yet" exist. "What is there to keep us here?" asks Hamm, rhetorically. "Dialogue", comes Clov's reply, earning the biggest laugh of the night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here