Sending money abroad?
International transfers have become a major battleground in the digital banking revolution, with high-street banks increasingly exposed for "rip-off" charges.
Since last month the market has seen the entry of John Lewis with a low-cost service, and a 'world money transfer day' highlighting the profits made at the expense of migrant workers sending vital cash home to developing countries.
John Lewis is the first high street retailer outside the Post Office to offer an international payments service with "competitive rates, quality customer service and transparency of charges".
It says high street banks can charge fees of between £10 and £40 regardless of the amount transferred and an exchange rate of up to four per cent. The retailer, through currency specialist HiFX, charges a transfer fee of £9 for transactions under £3,000, and no fees for higher amounts above this. There is also no maximum on the amount that can be transferred.
John Lewis International Payments will also refund any foreign bank receiving fees incurred by customers. "This commitment makes the John Lewis service unique in the market and could save customers even more money when transferring funds abroad," it says.
While the retailer's strategy is to offer customers help in managing their finances overseas, adding to travel insurance and foreign exchange, currency firms and online exchange services have sprung up to undercut traditional services.
Andrew Hagger at moneycomms.co.uk said: "It has been reported previously that up to 90 per cent of transactions are still conducted through the banks, so there is a huge amount of money to be saved if only consumers took advantage of deals from some of the specialist breed of online brokers such as FairFX, Caxton FX , HiFX and Moneycorp."
In a report for FairFX comparing those four with the Post Office, Western Union, and seven banks (including Nationwide), Moneycomms found a gap of £53 between cheapest and most expensive providers on a £1100 transfer.
The cost of transferring 1200 euros to Spain was cheapest at FairFX and Caxton FX, which levy no fees. The Post Office, also fee-free, offered the worst exchange rate, putting its total cost behind HSBC and RBS, but still £10 lower than Barclays and Western Union and £14 below Santander. FairFX was £40 cheaper than Santander, which like Nationwide charges a fee of £25.
Western Union was competitive for payments to the US and Australia, but very uncompetitive for Swiss, Polish or Czech transfers.
The fees levied by the banks generally far outweighed their often competitive exchange rates.
The World Bank estimates that money transfers from developed countries are worth a staggering $450billion a year to the developing world, supporting the welfare of an estimated 700 million people.
Challenger online service Azimo enables users to send money online from across the UK and EU to almost 200 countries, with transfer fees starting at £1.
Founder Michael Kent says: "Azimo is a business founded by migrants for migrants, so we understand the problems that high fees and poor customer service bring. The benefit of alternative and particularly online money transfer services is that it's super easy, low-cost, fast and secure.
"As an industry, it's time that money transfer businesses come together and helped our customers understand that there are alternatives to the likes of Western Union and MoneyGram who are just out there to line their own pockets. "
Former Labour minister Tessa Jowell, who co-organised the world money transfer day, said migrants "work hard, support our economy, and keep our city moving and our hospitals open". She added: "They should not be exploited when sending money abroad to support their families or friends - the transfer tax rip-off must stop."
Azimo's research found customers believing that 2.4 per cent is a 'fair' fee to charge for a money transfer, and 85per cent unwilling to pay more than £4.
It says: "However, global corporations such as Western Union, MoneyGram and high street banks who dominate the industry, currently charge on average 8-10 per cent on money transfers and in some corridors over 20 per cent."
The most popular methods of sending money overseas are through a bank (31 per cent), a high street money transfer provider (14 per cent) and online (19 per cent). Amongst under-34s banks remained the most popular method (36 per cent), followed by online (26 per cent), with 8 per cent using their mobile.
Yet over half of the under-34s still use banks or the high street with 26 per cent going online, and 8 per cent using their mobile phone.
Family support remains the number one reason for customer sending money (over 70 per cent). Other notable reasons were education, up from 3 per cent in to 8 per cent in 2014 and charitable donations, which rose from 2 per cent to 5 per cent.
The Moneycomms survey did not include person-to-person currency exchange providers like TransferWise and CurrencyFair, which also claim to offer the cheapest services. CurrencyFair says that for any amount over £2000, it is the only platform that can match or beat the interbank rate, "which banks, brokers and other transfer services can't do".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article