THE righteous indignation and confected outrage expressed by the Glasgow University academics sums up the absolutism of the bien pensant liberal left ("Campus visit from Israeli diplomat is 'breach of trust'" and Letters, The Herald, March 3).
I am certainly not a flag bearer for Israel, far from it in fact, but to suggest that the ideals and actions of Hamas-run Palestine, with its stated mission to "wipe the Jews from the earth" are somehow better is absurd, ill-informed and utterly hypocritical.
While risible in its treatment of Gaza, Israel remains a democracy where being blasphemous or gay doesn't result in being thrown from a tall building and stoned to death and where women aren't genitally mutilated, subjugated and treated like second-class citizens. The irony of their letter is that it would most likely be published in Israel. In Palestine they would be hiding from the police.
A university should be a place where young people are exposed to arguments from all cultures and the full spectrum of political views. Only then can they make up their own minds on what they believe to be right and wrong.
Guy Robertson,
Cleveden Drive,
Glasgow.
AT a public meeting on Monday night the Israeli Ambassador encouraged his audience to persuade open-minded critics of Israel to visit the country "to see for themselves, as they invariably return to the UK with an impression substantially different impression to their preconceived view".
I wonder how many of the contributors to the letter from a number of academics from Glasgow University have actually seen for themselves the prosperity and equality enjoyed by Arab citizens of Israel. Does this, together with the fact that Israel is providing free treatment in Israeli hospitals for wounded Syrians, not give some cause for thought?
M Green,
103 Ayr Road, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article