THE continuing correspondence on the subject of the GP recruitment and retention crisis makes me despair (Letters, April 20, 22 & 23).
How can one possibly compare the practice and provision of veterinary medicine with general practice? The set up is fundamentally different ... as is the clientele.
As for calling into question GPs' commitment and dedication, that is simply too much to bear. Despite these qualities which most GPs have in abundance, the fact remains that many are so worn out by the demands of this uniquely demanding job that they have to retire for the sake of their current or future physical and mental health. Those who do retire in their fifties accept the actuarial reduction in their pension as a cost worth paying but yes, I agree that GP pay provides a good pension (fully paid for by disproportionately large contributions) but my younger colleagues in the new NHS scheme are not so fortunate, as they will have to work several years longer to accrue similar benefits. Watch for the huge increase in ill health retirals in 15-20 years as GPs drop from burn-out and exhaustion if nothing is done to address the problem.
The crisis remains self-evident and will remain unsolved as long as the extent of, and the reasons for, the crisis remain beyond the comprehension of those whom one would expect to appreciate them and those like your correspondents, who clearly cannot.
Dr David Mathie,
16 Sheepburn Road,
Uddingston.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article