THE head of the powerful statutory body which regulates Scotland's 12,000 crofters has been forced to quit after being confronted by a vote of no confidence in her leadership.
Susan Walker, who was chosen by ministers, has resigned having lost the support of a majority of her fellow commissioners who want to appoint their own chair.
The Crofting Commission is due to meet Environment Minister Aileen McLeod on May 22, to discuss the way ahead following Mrs Walker's departure."
A commission spokeswoman confirmed she had resigned as convener and as a commissioner, adding: "We respect Susan's decision and we are grateful for the contribution made during her time with the commission.
"We would like to wish Susan all the best for the future."
Mrs Walker, who is married to a Skye crofter, was one of three commissioners appointed by Scottish ministers and civil servants to the Crofting Commission when it came into existence in April 2012.
The remaining six commissioners were all directly elected by Scotland's 12,000 crofters, covering six different geographical areas across the Highlands and Islands. A total of 10,880 votes were cast for 28 candidates.
The Herald revealed last month that at least five commissioners had called a special meeting in order to move a motion of no confidence in Mrs Walker.
The commission was set up to regulate crofting and to promote occupancy and active use of the land to enhance rural communities. If it finds crofts are unoccupied and not being worked, it can make them available to those who want to croft properly, by imposing new tenants on any absentee crofter.
Many assumed the convener would be one of the six commissioners who were voted for. But the Scottish Government appointed Mrs Walker, who is co-author of The State of Crofting in Camuscross, an academic report on Skye crofting in her local township.
She was also a director of the Camuscross and Duisdale Initiative, a community trust working in partnership with crofters and grazings shareholders on local food.
But there has been growing concern amongst her fellow commissioners over her style of leadership. In particular that she has assumed the role of an executive chair, reportedly taking some decisions without consulting them.
Environment Minister Aileen McLeod said of Mrs Walker's departure: "I would like to thank Susan for all of her hard work and for making such a positive contribution to crofting during her time as commissioner and convener.
"From the first time I met Susan shortly after I was appointed Crofting Minister, I have been impressed by her vision and passion for crofting and Scotland's crofting communities, as well as her expertise and her many achievements since taking office."
These had included leading a comprehensive review of Crofting Commission policies and procedures, and working to raise the profile commission.
The minister continued: "I look forward to meeting the remaining commissioners later this month, when I will discuss with them next steps for appointing a new convener and filling the vacancy on the commission, in line with crofting legislation."
The 2010 act requires Scottish ministers to either select a member to be the convener or delegate that task to the commission.
Dr Michael Foxley, the former leader of the Highland Council who is a crofter himself and had stood unsuccessfully for election to the commission, said: "There is no doubt the convener should come from those commissioners who have been directly elected by the crofting community."
Mrs Walker was unavailable for comment last night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article