The taxman has often faced accusations of imposing draconian fines for people who can't get their returns in on time.
But it has emerged HM Revenue and Customs is so tardy at answering the phone that it has cost the taxpayer £136 million a year.
The National Audit Office (NAO) today branded the collector "totally unacceptable" after 20 million calls to its hotlines – many of which are costly 0845 numbers – were not picked up at all.
People who did get through were also waiting more than twice as long to speak to an adviser; an average of 282 seconds compared with 107 seconds in 2009/10.
In the first quarter of this year, 6.5 million people were left holding on for longer than 10 minutes.
The NAO found there had been some progress after thousands more staff were drafted in with the 74% pick-up rate significantly higher than the 48% recorded in 2010/11.
Yet the report warned the figures probably underestimated the issue as calls are counted as answered even if they do not reach an adviser.
Labour's Margaret Hodge, who chairs the Committee of Public Accounts, said: "I find it totally unacceptable that HMRC uses costly 0845 numbers and charges people for the privilege of waiting for the department to pick up."
Sluggish performance amounted to a taxpayer telephone toll of £136 million in lost customer time and call charges in 2011/12. She said current call answering targets were "far too soft".
The NAO estimated that in 2011/12, it cost customers £33 million in call charges while they waited for HMRC to answer the phone and the estimated value of customer time while they waited was £103m.
Catherine McKinnell, the Shadow Treasury Minister, urged ministers to "get a grip".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article