COUNCILLORS in the Highlands have issued a clear signal to the nuclear
waste agency Nirex that they will do everything in their power to
prevent the construction of a nuclear waste dump at Dounreay in
Caithness.
The region's planning committee yesterday threw out an application
from the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority for permission to sink
two exploratory bore holes of 800 and 1500 metres below the Dounreay
site to establish the geological suitability for the long-term storage
of nuclear waste.
Nirex has identified two possible sites -- Dounreay and Sellafield --
to house Britain's national repository for radioactive waste. The
eventual location will involve a #1000m civil engineering project to
create a store to contain all the country's low and intermediate level
nuclear waste. The number of jobs likely to be created by the project
has been hotly disputed, but is unlikely to be more than a few hundred.
At yesterday's meeting in Inverness a handful of councillors, mainly
supporters of the nuclear industry from Caithness, argued against taking
a stance on the planning application until the council had visited the
Forsmark Nuclear Waste Repository in Sweden.
But the committee voted by 16 votes to five to reject the application.
Councillors in Caithness are keen to find alternative work for
Dounreay to counteract the rundown in the fast breeder project based
there, but a motion to allow the test bores to go ahead failed even to
find a seconder.
Councillor Duncan MacPherson, the region's vice convener, said: ''If
we were to say 'yes' it would be seen as an open door to Nirex and we
would be regarded as a soft touch.
''The policy of the council has been to refuse to accept low and
medium level waste from outside the Highlands. Fifty-five percent of
that waste is being produced at Sellafield itself, and it doesn't make
sense to cart it all the way to Caithness. It should be left at
Sellafield.''
Mrs Winnie Ewing, the MEP for the Highlands and Islands, welcomed the
stance adopted by the council. ''I applaud this decision, and especially
the large majority by which it was taken, which reflects the widespread
and growing determination throughout the whole of Scotland to say 'no'
to Nirex,'' she said.
''Nuclear dumping was one of the central issues in the Highlands and
islands in last month's Euro elections, and I stand by my pledge to use
whatever means are necessary to stop Scotland being turned into a
nuclear dumping ground.''
UKAEA is carrying out the appraisal of the Dounreay site on behalf of
Nirex, and a spokesman at the Caithness plant said yesterday the
authority was disappointed by the decision. It will now consider
appealing to the Scottish Secretary to overturn the decision or order a
public inquiry.
A similar application to drill test bore holes at Sellafield was last
year rejected by Cumbria County Council. But British Nuclear Fuels Ltd.
appealed against the decision and the Environment Secretary overruled
the council last March and the exploratory work is now going ahead.
Mr James Wallace, Democrat MP for Orkney and Shetland, said yesterday
that if there was to be a public inquiry into the Nirex application the
objectors should receive public funding, possibly on condition they
united under one umbrella organisation.
He also attacked Mr Malcolm Rifkind for excessive delay in publishing
his decision on the nuclear industry's application to site the European
Demonstration Re-processing Plant at Dounreay.
He said the Reporter's report had been on Mr Rifkind's desk for 15
months. He added: ''If there is to be another public inquiry, Mr Rifkind
must restore public confidence in the system and give assurances that
the report will not disapppear into some black hole in the Scottish
Office.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article