'Muggeridge - The Biography', Richard Ingrams, Harper Collins, #18
MALCOLM Muggeridge and I met only twice. I doubt if the old boy
remembered either occasion. He was quite good at not remembering things.
My first and second impressions of the famous media personality were of
an affected, self-obsessed hypocrite. Nothing in this biography by
Richard Ingrams changes that opinion.
Our first encounter was at the Edinburgh University rectorial election
of 1966, over sherry in the senior common room of Holland House, a hall
of residence which in those days had pretensions to the social
organisation of an Oxbridge college.
As a junior member of his victorious campaign team (I had designed the
''Betta Getta Muggerector'' poster) I managed to corner the great man
for five minutes. He was the first famous person I had ever met, after
all, although I had once been within two yards of the Queen Mum when she
visited my school in England. But she spoke to the boy next to me.
As an opener after the pleasantries, I suggested to the scourge of the
Establishment that it might be nice if our new rector could take the
chair of the university court -- of which he was now the elected
president -- and put forward the case for students to have some small
role in the administration of our university.
I thought I was saying the right thing. Not a bit of it. The old
buzzard ranted that students were there to study and running the
university was none of their business. Without waiting for a reply, he
swung on his heel and plunged into conversation with a senior academic.
It was clear that, after all, we were not going to have a ''working''
rector. That would have to wait until 1972, when Gordon Brown became the
second student rector after my own brief, stormy, and not very effective
tenure of the post.
Our second meeting was on the day of Muggeridge's infamous sermon in
St Giles Cathedral, when he denounced us all for our slobbering
addiction to sex and pot, resigned the rectorship from the pulpit and
boosted his faltering career through the resulting publicity.
I was selling copies of the Student newspaper outside the university
staff club in Chambers Street that morning. As news editor of the paper
I always carried a fag packet as a notebook. As Muggeridge strode up, I
whipped it out and respectfuly asked our Lord Rector if he had any
comment on the editorial of that day's edition.
I expected him to criticise the demand by my editor, Anna Coote, that
he should act as advocate for the democratically elected Students
Representative Council in their campaign to have contraceptive advice
freely available at the student health centre or resign. He was supposed
to advocate, if not to agree.
He did not mention the irreconcilable crisis of personal conscience
which this caused him, and about which he was to pontificate in St Giles
a few hours later. Instead, he jabbed a quivering finger at the
back-page cartoon by Phil Bevis, a maths student and cartoonist of
Scarfeian potential whom I last heard of living in obscurity on the
wrong side of Hampstead. It showed Muggeridge as a screaming skull. With
hindsight, it seems remarkably prescient.
''If I had published something like this, I would go to my grave
ashamed!'' he roared, and walked out of my life.
Shame, and expiating it, was what St Mugg was all about. By the time
he did go to his grave he had done extensive, well-publicised penance
for his indulgence in women (he walked out on his poor wife a few times,
as well as on me), whisky, tobacco, barbiturates and savage, unprovoked
attacks on people and causes he had once espoused.
Ingrams, Muggeridge's protege, gives us more detail than Ian Hunter's
1980 biography.
Although this is to some extent an authorised biography, it does not
dodge sensationally embarrassing facts. Ingrams doggedly catalogues the
peccadilloes of a serial philanderer, absentee father, quarrelsome
drunk, sometime radical, failed novelist, spy, professional dilettante,
and rather nasty (if amusing) snob. It makes a thoroughly good read.
The Edinburgh University incident rates only a page in Ingrams's book
but the furore did catapault Muggeridge to fame as a repenting sinner
and born-again media Christian. The last of his many careers, religious
broadcasting, was launched on that chilly Edinburgh evening.
Ingrams relies exclusively on the Muggeridge version of events,
describing Anna Coote and the rest of us as ''a small and
unrepresentative band of Marxists''. I don't think Anna was a Marxist,
then or now. Nor was I. Besides, we were all democratically elected,
some of us with bigger majorities than Muggeridge.
As for our ''political posturings'', the Students' Representative
Council did not condone or have a policy on promiscuity. The demand for
better contraceptive advice for students was the result of sober,
factual debate about the increasing problem of unwanted pregnancies.
Muggeridge, with his extensive personal knowledge of the leg-over
business, might have been expected to support it.
Yes, we liked our nookie, although even the most dissolute could not
rival the rector's track record in sexual athletics. Many of us had
smoked a joint or two but beer was our favoured intoxicant and very few
took LSD more than once (I have yet to try it). You could not function
in student politics or journalism if you were a dopehead, not least
because you needed your wits about you when dinosaurs like Muggeridge
were stalking the swamp.
As so often happened, Muggeridge reached for ready-to-wear prejudices
rather than facts when he composed his diatribe against ''permissive''
students. Ingrams notes repeatedly that once he had an idea in his head
it was impossible to shift it, whatever the evidence to the contrary.
The biographer's own failure properly to investigate that 27-year-old
storm in a teacup at Edinburgh University makes me wonder how good his
research is on other, more important topics.
Muggeridge was a pain in the backside all his life. He took a sadistic
pleasure in sneering at former mentors such as C P Scott of the
Manchester Guardian. His accent was false and he was often false to his
friends. A fickle biter of hands that fed him, he got away with it
because he could be such scintillating good company -- and because he
would defend his betrayals as necessities in the pursuit of ''truth''.
In a hundred years he will be remembered for only two achievements
among the ''Chronicles of Wasted Time'' described so selectively in his
1972 autobiography: the brilliant Manchester Guardian reports from the
Soviet Union in March 1933, when he was the first to expose Stalin's
genocide of the Kulaks; and his (at first unwitting) creation of Mother
Teresa of Calcutta as a reluctant media superstar.
In the end, he made his peace with his maker. It was a pity, but not a
surprise, that returning to the fold involved using his considerable
talents for some very dubious causes on the new religious right.
It was even more of a pity that, having revealed the extent of the
Bolshevik-engineered famine in the Ukraine and the blind hypocrisy of
Communist fellow-travellers in the West, he turned viciously against the
civilised, compassionate traditions of British democratic socialism and
rejected the faith of his father, Croydon Labour councillor Harry
Muggeridge.
Muggeridge Senior emerges from Ingrams's book as a better man, in
almost every respect, than his tormented third son.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article