COLIN Boyd, the lord advocate, was yesterday made a working peer in the House of Lords, fuelling the debate about the independence of his role as head of the prosecution service in Scotland.
Questions were also asked of his ability to carry out this new function while still retaining his other role as legal adviser within the Scottish Cabinet.
There was confusion over the status of Mr Boyd, with the Crown Office stating that he would become a Labour working peer, while Downing Street said that he would sit as a crossbencher.
Mr Boyd said: "It is a great honour, both personally and professionally, to be appointed to serve in the House of Lords. I look forward to playing an effective role in policy-making for the UK, especially in relation to Scottish affairs.
"In particular, I will be in a position to make a significant contribution to debate on reserved issues which affect Scotland. The ability to represent in the House views which are relevant to my duties as a Scottish law officer is welcome, and I will take all opportunities to make useful contribution to debate in this regard.
"I remain firmly committed to the full-time role of lord advocate, leading the Crown Office and procurator-fiscal service, and seeing through the programme of reform I initiated four years ago. I see the appointment to the House of Lords as a natural extension of my duties as lord advocate."
Nicola Sturgeon, SNP leader at Holyrood, said: "The role of lord advocate is already too political by being in Cabinet, I fear this may make it worse. The time has come for the lord advocate to become genuinely independent of politics and not a member of the Cabinet."
David Mundell, the Tories' shadow Scottish secretary, said: "This shows the complete contempt Labour has for the House of Lords and the institutions of democracy. Either Colin Boyd is a member of the government or he is a crossbencher - he can't be both."
Mr Boyd was one of seven Labour nominations, while seven Tories were appointed along with five Liberal Democrats, one Ulster Unionist and three Democratic Unionists. Labour now has 221 peers, with the Tories and Liberal Democrats combined with 295.
Margaret Ford, chairwoman of English Partnership and former chairwoman of Lothian Health Board, and executive director of Scottish Homes, was another Labour nomination.
The new list revealed that Tony Blair, the prime minister, abandoned attempts to appoint more Labour than Tory peers in the wake of the controversy over loans for peerages.
Mr Blair had nominated four businessmen who bankrolled Labour during the general election campaign, but they withdrew their names amid a media outcry over their financial arrangements with the party.
It is understood the four, as well as one Tory, were or would have been blocked by the Lords Appointments Commission, which makes recommendations to Mr Blair.
Sir Bill Morris, former leader of the T&G union, and Maggie Jones, Unison's director of policy and public affairs, who failed to become an MP at the general election, were both elevated to the Upper House.
David Trimble, former Ulster Unionists leader, will become a peer and, in a departure from tradition, there will be three DUP nominees, one of whom is Eileen Paisley, the vicepresident of the party and wife of Ian Paisley, the DUP leader.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article