THE FBI is investigating whether people pressing families of victims
of the Lockerbie bombing to accept a financial settlement are Libyan
agents, a US official said yesterday.
The State Department confirmed some families had been contacted by two
lawyers who offered a deal.
''The FBI is investigating whether they are agents of Libya and may
have violated US law or United Nations sanctions as a result,'' said the
official, who asked not to be identified.
NBC television reported on Wednesday that each family was being
pressed to accept $1m (#530,000) in a deal that would allow Colonel
Gaddafi to save face by turning over two suspects to a country
sympathetic to Libya.
The report showed film of men said to be working for Henry Kartshner,
identified only as an American agriculturist, offering a victim's family
$1m in a plan aimed at lifting US trade sanctions against Libya.
The men were identified as Val Miller, a lawyer, and C. McClain
Haddow, a former Reagan administration official.
Kartshner stands to ''make millions'' if the sanctions, imposed
against Libya until it turns over the suspects to Britain or the US, are
lifted, the report said.
NBC said Kartshner and the men met Libyan officials in Zurich to
determine the deal to offer each family $1m.
Meanwhile, a Briton campaigning for the bombers to be brought to
justice yesterday denounced the ''bribe''.
Dr Jim Swire, who lost a daughter in the disaster, was unaware of any
move ''to buy off British relatives'', but said even the most hard-up
would resist the offer.
He criticised any attempt to pervert the course of justice.
''It could not succeed with the British relatives, but I can't speak
for the American ones,'' he added.
A total of 270 people were killed when flight 103 was blown up over
Lockerbie in 1988.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article