The Natural Law Party launched its campaign for the European elections
in Edinburgh yesterday. But is everything really what it seems?
SOMEONE in the publicity department should take a bow. Two years ago,
the Natural Law Party arrived on the British political scene in a haze
of bum-bouncing yogic fliers, a manifesto which defied rational
interpretation, and a promotional concert by George Harrison at the
Royal Albert Hall.
The party disappeared without trace, achieving a dismal average of 100
votes in each of the 310 General Election seats it contested, but
supporters could claim that as a reasonable return for a campaign which
began only three weeks before polling day.
Then, earlier this month, when the nominations for June's
Euro-elections closed, the NLP staged another media coup.
A close inspection of political history reveals that no single party
has ever fought every UK seat in a national election, be it for
Westminster or Brussels. A headline-grabbing record was available, and
was duly notched up: the NLP put forward 87 candidates, including three
in Northern Ireland, where MEPs are elected by proportional
representation.
Yesterday, in the splendour of the Caledonian Hotel, the assembled
journalists were treated to another session of yogic flying, and an
exposition on how the phenomenon could improve the quality of life
across Europe. It's so far out, it could hardly fail to tickle the
imagination of a jaded editor.
So, as we said, bouquets to the PR department. But perhaps attracting
media interest is only a superficial goal for the NLP.
The party offers a vague, mystic panacea of global peace through
Transcendental Meditation, as inspired by the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, the
guy who hooked Mia Farrow and The Beatles in the 1960s, before it all
ended in tears.
Now, suppose someone wanted to relaunch this outdated philosophy in
the ultra-sceptical world of 1994. They could try to infiltrate current
educational thinking, take over a newspaper company, or simply spend
#87,000.
The third option represents a #1000 deposit for every Euro seat in the
UK, and also a tiny investment which brings a massive dividend.
Primarily, the returns are:
* An automatic party political broadcast on BBC1, BBC2 and ITV. Buying
five minutes of peak-time advertising space on the commercial network
alone would cost at least #1m.
* Free use of the Royal Mail to send an election communique to every
voter in the UK. Say, 40 million second class stamps at 19p equals
#7.5m.
* Guaranteed inclusion in virtually all media coverage of the
elections; and,
* The right to spend around #25,000 on campaigning material for each
of the 87 candidates, under the veneer of electoral credibility.
Apart from the #87,000, the only other essential for the NLP is
candidates. For Scotland's eight seats, four of the NLP hopefuls live in
England: one in Lancashire; and three in the same house in Dunstable,
Bedfordshire.
The Gilmours -- Margaret, Dobie and Sarah -- are Ma, Pa and the wean
of the NLP. We are told that, having once lived in the Dunoon area, they
have kept a holiday home on Cowal and their heart resides here.
Three of the other four candidates are, respectively, German, English
and American, although they at least do live in Scotland.
However, it must be admitted that all of the above is only a cynical
theory. Politicians, as we know, should be taken at their word, and NLP
leader Dr Geoffrey Clements insisted yesterday that his movement was a
serious political party, legally and financially separate from the
charity which promotes Transcendental Meditation. Of course.
Asked if he was exploiting the electoral process with an ulterior
motive, he replied: ''No. There is no exploitation. We are using the
opportunities available. All our candidates have paid their own deposit,
through either their own finances or with the help of supporters.''
Dr Clements is perhaps the ultimate model of a political leader.
Dressed in a fawn suit, with a perfect hairstyle and wearing gold
cufflinks and three rings, he can deliver a 45-minute address without
notes, and without stumbling. He oozes credibility to the verge of
smugness.
His ideas, though, are less convincing. The NLP programmes, he says,
would reduce disease by 50%, cut crime by up to 30%, create new jobs,
abolish VAT, build invincible defence and create ideal education. No
problem, especially when you bear the slogan: ''Only a new seed will
yield a new crop.''
So: radical alternatives, or electoral charlatans? One conclusion is
offered by Dr John Curtice, a politics lecturer at Strathclyde
University who specialises in monitoring elections.
He said: ''The NLP is trying to exploit the electoral process as a
mechanism for gaining publicity for their particular religious or
spiritual message. They show no serious aspirations of actually working
to represent people in government.''
And they have exploited a loophole quite legally. One Scottish
elections official said yesterday: ''It is very difficult to draw a line
between those who have a legitimate political cause, and those who do
not. The system is wide open, and deliberately so, for good democratic
reasons.''
The criteria for elections were recently relaxed, and no party is
likely to champion another change in the rules, since that could hamper
its own political efforts.
As the man said, it is wide open.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article