Keith Sinclair
A seafaring tradition comes to an end amid accusations against the
Government
THE last of Scotland's west coast puffer companies, whose bulk cargo
vessels provided an economic lifeline to many parts of the Highlands and
Islands, finally ran out of steam yesterday.
The closure of Greenock-based Glenlight Shipping Ltd -- which warned
last year that its future was threatened unless the Scottish Office
invested more in supporting the services -- brings to an end a
150-year-old seafaring tradition and has prompted accusations from
Opposition parties that the Government has an ''abject disregard'' for
the people of the Highlands.
The firm, whose fleet of three coasters and two barges supplied some
of the most remote parts of Scotland with coal, salt, and building
materials, has warned that its withdrawal will inevitably have an
adverse effect on the economic and social conditions of many communities
and claims that alternative shipping companies will not compensate for
the withdrawal.
As expected by most observers, Glenlight Shipping's parent company,
the Clyde Shipping Company, whose origins date back to 1815, announced
yesterday that its board of directors had decided with regret that it
could not continue investing private capital to support a public
service.
Glenlight Shipping, which had been seeking an improved subsidy package
for three years, has criticised the role of the Government in its demise
and claims that the Scottish Office has ''dumped'' the company despite
earlier assurances that it was committed to supporting the services and
independent examinations which showed it to be the most efficient bulk
shipping company they subsidise.
The Scottish Offices's Industry Department recently agreed to raise
from #350,000 to #500,000 the amount Glenlight Shipping could claim
under the Tariff Rebate Subsidy (TRS) -- which is designed to make
lifeline services more viable -- but refused to give a #625,000 deficit
grant to cover anticipated losses on the grounds that other shipping
operators would take over if the company withdrew.
It has been claimed by the Friends of Scottish Ferries Group that the
Scottish Office has already identified four prospective operators --
Gardner Shipping (Scotland) Ltd and Easdale Island Shipping Co., both of
Oban, Cunninghams of Stornoway, and Dennison Shipping of Orkney.
The Industry Department also pointed out that a review into the whole
issue of support for shipping services was being carried out by the
Scottish Office and that it would be inappropriate in advance of its
conclusions next month to give Glenlight Shipping a commitment to
additional funding which would involve a major change in present
arrangements.
Western Isles Islands Council has not surprisingly greeted news of the
closure with considerable alarm and claimed yesterday that the
alternative of transporting freight by road across the mainland and by
Caledonian MacBrayne ferry will cost significantly more than at present,
and will add to the cost of living and put more financial pressure on
local businesses due to increasing costs of raw materials.
The council is also seriously concerned that an increase in commercial
traffic on the ferries will adversely affect the availability of places
to tourist traffic, particularly at peak periods, and damage road
surfaces.
Council convener, Mr Donald Macleod, said: ''The increased costs that
will result from the alternative means of transporting these essential
goods will be an additional burden on an already fragile economy.
''If you add these extra costs to the airport tax proposed in the
Budget for October this year and the forthcoming increases in petrol
prices, living and working in the Western isles will become very
expensive indeed.''
The Scottish Office is likely to come under some pressure to justify
its position on freight services from Opposition voices such as Labour's
transport spokesman Brian Wilson, who said yesterday that he was
suspicious that it had what he called a ''wider strategy.''
Mr Wilson has written to Mr Lang concerning a claim by Glenlight that
they were told before the closure announcement that the level of Tariff
Rebate Subsidy was to be cut in 1994 from 40% to 30%, with the result
that charges would rise by 17%.
He said: ''If this is true, the issue goes a lot wider than Glenlight.
Such an increase in charges would force large quantities of freight away
from these bulk carriers, thereby threatening the viability of other
operators.
''If this is so, it would look as if there was a deliberate strategy
of running down the bulk freight capacity to the west coast islands. Why
should this be? It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it is
related to the Government's review of Caledonian MacBrayne's future.''
Other Scottish Office critics believe there are a number of questions
Mr Lang must answer on matters such as the operators he claims will
provide similar freight services to Glenlight's.
Mrs Ray Michie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat Spokeswoman and MP for
Argyll and Bute, questions whether any other companies have the
specialist equipment and cranes which allowed Glenlight's vessels to
deliver cargo to many islands which have no unloading equipment.
She said: ''I would also like to know whether Caledonian MacBrayne
would receive the Tariff Rebate Subsidy were they to carry the road
vehicles which will inevitably take up some of Glenlight's business. Was
Caledonian MacBrayne involved in lobbying against deficit financing for
Glenlight?''
Mrs Michie said that, if the answer to both questions was yes, some
people may suspect that this decision is indeed part of a strategy to
fatten-up CalMac for privatisation. ''If this is the case, it is wholly
intolerable,'' she added.
Meanwhile, Glenlight Shipping claims that, given the way it has been
treated by the Scottish Office, a rush of companies seeking to replace
them is unlikely.
Asked about future freight services to the Highlands and Islands, Mr
Alex Fawcett, Glenlight's managing director, said he believes some work
will go to CalMac but forecast that a significant proportion will be
gained by foreign companies.
''Road salt which currently comes from Northern Ireland will not be
taken on a convoluted route via ferry to Stranraer and by lorry up the
Scottish mainland before loading on to another ferry,'' he said. ''It is
more likely that German or Moroccan salt will be shipped to a central
point at Inverness or Invergordon.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article