Three hundred years after the end of the Salem witch-hunt, Kennedy
Wilson examines various explanations of its cause.
IN 1692 strange events took place in Salem, Massachusetts, events that
have never been thoroughly explained. The general feeling today is that
what occurred in Salem village had very little to do with witchcraft at
all. Everything from menopausal paranoia to the psychopathology of
adolescence has been put forward as possible causes.
The story began in February 1692 when a little girl told a fortune and
others began to cast spells. Excitement in England over witches had
spread to the colonies. William Penn, the distinguished Quaker
theologian and founder of Pennsylvania, even sat on a witch-trial but
dismissed the case, saying that ''there was no law in Pennsylvania
against riding on broomsticks''.
In the past 20 years the amount of speculation and scholarly theories
has exploded. Was it illness, mass hypnosis, or something more
down-to-earth that caused fits and hallucinations and suggested to the
fathers of the town that the young women were practising witches?
Modern medical theories have proposed everything from acute
premenstrual tension to post-traumatic stress syndrome (the condition
that afflicts soldiers after conflict). Was it abuse from stern parents
or just youthful high spirits that left 19 dead, 150 jailed, and
hundreds imprisoned? A hippie-inclined theory suggested that magic
mushrooms were to blame. If new ideas are given credence then Salem was
a town full of very twentieth-century neuroses and a place more in need
of counselling than courtrooms.
''Thanks to scholars, seventeenth-century Salem has emerged anew as a
nervous, recognisable town that seems to have been bedevilled far more
by sexism than sorcery, downward mobility than devils,'' wrote Mark Muro
of the Boston Globe recently.
Every few years there is another book or study which re-examines the
events. Feminists blame the frenzy on misogynistic Puritan culture, and
say that witch-hunts were a backlash against unconventional women. It
was a male-dominated society's revenge on such uppity women as Rebecca
Nurse who ''continewed to rail and scold'' after a neighbour's pig
trampled her corn.
Another trendy theory suggests the trials were racially inspired.
Several Salem girls were reported to have been seen listening to voodoo
stories told by Tituba, a Caribbean slave-woman. Tituba told fortunes
and suggested who the girls' future husbands might be. The girls began
behaving oddly; they became moody and had visions.
Tituba was blamed and then, perhaps to save herself, she told of a
witch conspiracy. Some theoreticians say that hapless Tituba represented
white fears of alien, black culture; others say a suppressed guilt
surrounding slavery from an ultra-religious community found an outlet in
punishing her.
Carol Karlson's study, The Devil In The Shape Of A Woman, suggested
that many of those ''cried down'' as witches were rich widows, women
with careers, or women who controlled assets. Elinor Hollingworth, for
example, ran a tavern. ''For a long time people have said, 'Oh, Salem
was an aberration; the bigots just went berserk', but scholars have
tried to show that the witch-trials arose out of real people's lives for
real-world reasons,'' says Karlson.
Was greed the cause? Many of the women on trial stood to inherit
property. Acording to Karlson women from families without a male heir
accounted for 76% of women found guilty in New England witch-trials, and
86% of those executed. ''You didn't have to do anything to be accused,''
says Karlson. ''Just holding a measure of economic power provoked
reaction from a system designed to keep property in the hands of men.''
The town of Salem itself was prosperous and caused much envy from the
rural communities nearby. Two University of Massachusetts historians,
Stephen Nissenbaum and Paul Boyer, went through old tax-ledgers to
discover who owned what. Their theory suggests that rivalry was the
cause of the Salem incident. Nissenbaum and Boyer argued that
witch-hunts were a desperate rearguard action on the part of farming
folk against elitist townees. The poorer inland farmers led by the
Putnams fought dirty against their old rivals, the rich Porters.
Eight Putnams were involved in prosecuting 49 accused witches, of whom
19 were Porter allies. Ann Putnam accused Rebecca Nurse, for example,
possibly because of a dispute over land rights.
Last year, during the tercentenary of the witch-trials, while the town
was gripped by much commemorative tourist gimmickry, Alan Dershowitz,
the Harvard law professor who was involved in the Claus von Bulow trial
and Woody Allen case, came to Salem to discuss the history of legal
rights and the individual.
It was from the Salem witch-trials that we get a lot of
misconceptions. Witches were not burned in Salem but hanged. Women were
not the only victims -- five men were executed. The majority were not
old hags but young and middle-aged women. Court records show that one of
the alleged witches was a Mrs Margaret Thatcher. She escaped charges to
live another day.
In 1693 the royal governor, William Phips, returned from fighting
Indians and issued a proclamation to free all the suspects. After less
than a year, the trials ended as suddenly as they had begun. One of the
more disreputable chapters of American history was closed. And after
years of hiding its witchy legacy Salem is proud to call itself Witch
City. There are two museums and a Salem-based Witches' League for Public
Awareness. Since 1985 witchcraft (or Wicca) has been recognised as a
legitimate religion in the US.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article