POPULAR-science TV series always remind me of that song Jimmy Durante
used to sing about The Day He Read A Book. It was contagious/ Seventy
pagious/ There were pictures here and there/ So it wasn't hard to bear/
The day I read a book! Telly anthropologist Desmond Morris knows all
about putting pictures in here and there to hold the layman's flagging
attention: indeed, his new series The Human Animal (BBC1) opened its
first instalment with a long (and close) shot of a handsome young couple
walking bare-scud through a crowded shopping mall, all their belongings
on public view.
Morris's voiceover waxed rhapsodic about stuff like ''What is the
secret of this lavish, unprecedented success?'' (of human beings, that
is, and that's a begged question if ever I heard one), going on to point
out interesting things you never knew before like ''the breasts of the
female remain swollen throughout her life'' (close-up); humans are the
only primates with rounded, fleshy buttocks (close-up); and ''unlike all
other primates, the Naked Ape has only a few tufts of hair about its
body'' (close-up of man's armpit . . . and if you believe me when I say
that, you'll believe The Human Animal is a serious attempt to educate
the public).
What's more interesting to me than Morris's vapid conclusions (which
can be summed up as basically, we're all much the same and not so far
from the apes . . . only different, sort of) is the question of the
lavish, unprecedented success of Desmond Morris. You might think that
someone who has written a book (Manwatching) about human gestures and
body language would have more sense than to disguise his baldness by
adopting the Robert Robinson/Bobby Charlton style of combing it up from
the oxters and sticking it down with Araldite, but despite that
apparently fatal error of taste he's become the BBC's second-favourite
Scientist On The Telly after David Attenborough.
How? By telling you what you already know (it's hard to fake a smile .
. . making the wrong gesture in the wrong culture can get you a sore
face . . . we're all descended from monkeys, y'know . . .), making it
sound clever, and throwing in a spot of titillation every now and then,
that's how. Later in the current series we are promised a film of a
couple in the act of love, including footage shot from a place that only
a gynaecologist ever normally sees.
All in the best possible taste, and very educational, we're sure. Good
TV-science programmes leave you feeling slightly better informed for the
five minutes or so before you forget everything you've just heard, but
The Human Animal leaves you feeling, if anything, slightly more dumb for
having watched it. But that's the evolutionary difference between you
and me and Desmond Morris: he's swanning around the world in a safari
suit, and we're at home watching the telly. Who's daft?
Talking of daft, I should have known it was a mistake to watch David
Frost's new mawkathon Good Fortune! (BBC1) while sitting by an open
window on a sultry summer Sunday; my jaw was so immovably dropped at the
sight and sound of it that I had to spend the rest of the evening
picking midges out of my teeth. ''Hello, good, evening, and welcome to
Good Fortune!'' our host greeted us. ''My role is a cross between
Sherlock Holmes and Santa Claus . . . for some people in the audience
and at home it's going to be Christmas in July.''
Let me explain: Good Fortune! is essentially Cilla Black's Surprise!
Surprise! with money instead of people, and without even Cilla's
notoriously liberal boundaries of good taste. Frostie's researchers
track down unclaimed money -- bequests, Premium Bonds wins, pension
rights -- find the people it belongs to, and bring the two together in
as undignified a manner as possible. Thus we had the story of an elderly
recluse called Dorothea Allen, who left estate of #2m a couple of years
ago -- ''but to whom? Are you one of her family? Could you pretend to be
one of her family?'' If you felt you could, there was a telephone
hotline for you to say so; You Are David Frost And I Claim My #2m.
Meanwhile, back in the studio, there was a nice old lady called
Phyllis Terry whose great wish was to resettle in Canada. ''Now,
Phyllis, I believe your mother passed away some years ago?'' (Brave nod,
sniffles.) ''Well, she left you #5000!'' (Seriously overcome.) ''And do
you remember your son Brian in Canada who lost touch with you 20 years
ago? He's here tonight!'' (Utter hysteria, and no wonder.)
Good Fortune!, like British justice, has to be seen to be disbelieved.
As has Small Talk (BBC1), a bizarre comedy gameshow, presented by
Ronnie Corbett, in which nine children have been asked questions
designed to elicit cute, amusing, or pathetic replies (''According to
the Bible, who were the first two people in the world?'' -- ''Jesus
Christ and the Romans'') and three adults try to guess which children
gave which answers.
The comedy comes mostly from jokes about Ronnie Corbett's similar
height to that of the children, which just shows how long an old pro can
keep one gag going. I remember him in a happier phase of his career,
with Ronnie Barker, singing a mean-Scotsman parody of Westering Home
that went something like this:
Westering home on the Blue Train to Ayr,
Cash in ma pooches and plenty to spare,
Wearing a schoolcap and travelling half-fare,
I like ma height -- it suits me!
But that was a long time and a few good scriptwriters ago, and Corbett
is nowadays reduced to a lesser comic stature. He should know better
than to work with children, anyway.
I've been a fan of Channel 4's Short Stories for as long it's been
running, which must be four or five years now; its quirky,
non-judgmental slant on the human comedy lets its subjects reveal their
own tales without being set up or unduly intruded upon. A new series
began this week with The Pitcher, all about Birmingham market trader
Mick Gill-Carson, ''the cheapest man in Britain''.
Watching him work his audience with a mixture of high-pressure
salesmanship, jokes, and affectionate insults, you got the feeling that
selling poor people cheap bras and personal stereos was merely a
sideline to being in street-theatre showbiz -- but that's only a measure
of how good at his trade he is. Although full of good moments, as when
Mick bought a consignment of surplus crucifixes (''worth at least #1.25
for scrap, that is'') and jocularly tried to pass them off as being made
from ''the original trees in the Garden of Gethsemane'', there was a
certain edge lacking in the programme, an unwillingness to probe the
dodgier side of what is after all a fairly raffish business.
I didn't mind being invited to like Mick -- I'd say he was more honest
than David Frost and Good Fortune!, anyway -- I just drew the line at
being asked to think he was some kind of poor man's friend. As for the
crucifixes, a vicar in the crowd picked him up on their alleged Holy
Land origin and Mick was humbly apologetic. He gave the vicar one of
them to put up in his own church.
I think I've finally identified why this devout couch potato is so
fond of American sitcoms: no matter what their ostensible setting, they
stay in the Great Indoors all the time, away from weather and midges and
stuff like that. Big Wave Dave's, which I picked up on for the first
time this week, comes from the Cheers! stable of writers and is
ostensibly set on the beaches of Miami, where three
midlife-crisis-suffering buddies have settled to run a surfing-goods
store and escape from the frenetic pace of professional life in Chicago.
Yet you never see the beach: just the inside of the shop, the local
bar, and domestic interiors. In one scene this week, Adam Arkin's wife
reproved him in the middle of the night with neglecting the healthy
outdoor advantages of their new location. She pointed to them from the
bedroom window, but you knew they weren't there. And Adam didn't care
whether they were or not; he's more into beer, buddies, and football on
TV. Way to go.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article