THE floodgates opened last night on the footballer accused of turning to the courts to protect his privacy after a Scottish newspaper took the dramatic step of identifying him.
The Herald’s sister paper, the Sunday Herald, was the first major UK publication to openly link the English Premier League player to claims he took out a gagging order to prevent allegations of an affair.
Though legal restrictions prevent English and Welsh publications and news sites from running full details, hundreds of thousands of Twitter users circulated the name and some posted photographs of the Sunday Herald which were viewed hundreds of thousands of times.
The Sunday Herald’s exposure of the player, whose name was already in the public domain through thousands of references on Twitter, prompted an outpouring of support from internet users making a mockery of super-injunctions.
The court gagging orders have been criticised by politicians and lawyers, who warn they have run far beyond their intended purpose of protecting people’s private lives.
Publicist Max Clifford said it was “inevitable” a newspaper would take the step of naming the player.
On the player’s decision to seek a super-injunction, he added: “He is making the whole situation a farce and making the damage to himself increase. He has been very badly advised.”
The Sunday Herald is published by a Scottish company and distributed exclusively in Scotland and as such the super-injunction is not applicable.
Huge numbers of people had been freely naming the man they believe is involved via Twitter, and the footballer has even begun legal action against the social network to suppress the information.
The married star is alleged to have had an affair with Big Brother contestant Imogen Thomas, who has fought in vain to overturn the order preventing her from disclosing his identity.
However, Sunday Herald editor Richard Walker said the details of the alleged affair – which may or may not have taken place – were of no concern in deciding to publish the player’s name yesterday.
“It’s irrelevant to our story, and it’s irrelevant to the point we raised,” he said. “What’s getting lost in this is what we printed: that the guy in question has been named in thousands of tweets. I don’t know whether or not he’s the man taking out the injunction, but I do know we can say in all certainty that he’s the man being named on Twitter.
“It seems odd thousands of people can name him online, but if a newspaper states the truth it’s not allowed.”
Foreign media are baffled by the restrictions in Britain, and international publications have aired the player’s name with scant regard for the English super-injunction.
Privacy laws in the UK are less clear than in some countries, but the response to the footballer’s outing will put pressure on legislators to stem the perceived abuse of super-injunctions by the rich and famous.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article