THE Government has "failed to get to grips" with cutting air pollution in UK cities, despite evidence it is shortening average life expectancy by seven to eight months and costing society up to £20 billion a year, MPs have claimed.
A report by Westminster’s Environmental Audit Com-mittee yesterday accused ministers of putting thousands of lives at risk by trying to dilute European air quality regulations instead of prioritising action.
Glasgow and Aberdeen are among a handful of cities expected to breach 2010 targets for bringing down the level of dangerous pollu-tants such as nitrogen dioxide and particulates, which were associated with 30,000 deaths in 2008, MPs found.
Joan Walley, the committee’s chairwoman, said: “It is a national scandal that thousands of people are still dying from air pollution in the UK in 2011 – and the Government is taking no responsibility for this.
“It is often the poorest people in our cities who live near the busiest roads and breathe in diesel fumes, dangerous chemicals and bits of tyre every day.
“If you have heart disease, asthma or other respiratory illnesses then living near a congested road can literally take years off your life.”
The committee called on the UK Government to implement recommend-ations it made last year.
They included an awareness campaign and setting up a national framework of low-emission zones that would allow councils to impose charges on vehicles with high levels of emissions when they enter urban areas.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article