A Scots-trained former Army doctor found guilty of misconduct by medical watchdogs over the death of Iraqi detainee Baha Mousa has been struck off the register.
Dr Derek Keilloh, 38, who trained at Aberdeen University and has been working as a GP, looked down and blinked slowly as the decision was delivered at the conclusion of a 47-day hearing by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) sitting in Manchester.
He supervised a failed resuscitation attempt to save the life of Mr Mousa, who had been hooded, handcuffed and severely beaten by soldiers after his arrest as a suspected insurgent in Basra in September 2003.
Dr Keilloh, then a captain and regimental medical officer of the 1st Battalion, Queen's Lancashire Regiment (1QLR), claimed later that he saw only dried blood around the nose of Mr Mousa, 26, while giving mouth-to-mouth and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Mr Mousa, an innocent father-of-two who worked as a hotel receptionist, had suffered 93 separate injuries, including fractured ribs and a broken nose.
He was arrested by soldiers who believed, wrongly, that he was an insurgent involved in the murder of four of their colleagues the month before.
The MPTS found Dr Keilloh guilty of misconduct following Mr Mousa's death and announced "with regret" yesterday that the only appropriate sanction was banning him from working as a doctor.
The panel heard that at the time of Mr Mousa's death, Dr Keilloh was aged 28, only eight weeks into the job, inadequately trained and given little supervision or support by the QLR, which was fighting a growing insurgency in the Iraqi city.
The MPTS recognised Dr Keilloh, now a GP at Mayford House Surgery in Northallerton, North Yorkshire, never harmed Mr Mousa and did everything possible to save his life, in a setting that was "highly charged, chaotic, tense and stressful". But they ruled he must have seen the injuries and, especially as a doctor, had a duty to act.
They questioned his honesty and "probity" after he lied to Army investigators about the injuries and, in sticking to his story, giving evidence in subsequent courts martial and a public inquiry.
The MPTS also said Dr Keilloh, knowing of Mr Mousa's injuries and sudden death, did not do enough to protect his patients, the other detainees, from further mistreatment – breaking a "fundamental tenet" of the medical profession.
He told soldiers not to beat other detainees, but the panel ruled he should have blown the whistle to senior officers about what went on. The MPTS decision said it was the repeated dishonesty in claiming not to have seen injuries to Mr Mousa that was wholly unacceptable.
Dr Brian Alderman said: "In all the circumstances, the panel determined that erasure is the only appropriate sanction in this case."
He told Dr Keilloh: "The panel has identified serious breaches of good medical practice and, given the gravity and nature of the extent and context of your dishonesty, it considers that your misconduct is fundamentally incompatible with continued registration."
An online petition and the backing of patients and fellow doctors now working with Dr Keilloh failed to save his job, despite supporters describing him in glowing terms.
Dr Keilloh took up his post in Basra in July 2003, as British soldiers tried to fill the vacuum left by the collapse of Saddam Hussein's police state.
Tempers boiled over after Captain David "Dai" Jones was blown up by a roadside bomb while in a military ambulance and three members of the Royal Military Police were killed when gunmen opened fire on their civilian Jeep. The deaths led to a crackdown on insurgents.
Dr Keilloh, a married father of two, has 28 days to appeal against the decision in the High Court to save his career.
Speaking after the hearing, Mr Mousa's father, Colonel Daoud Mousa, said: "I wanted the doctor to be banned for life. He did not have humanity in his heart when he was supposed to be caring for my son. He did not do his job properly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article