THE Labour Party yesterday imposed a wall of silence around beleaguered council chief Gordon Matheson amid claims his position was untenable after it emerged he had been reported to prosecutors for allegedly committing a sex act in public.
Opposition politicians and some Labour sources have called into question Mr Matheson's judgment and credibility following the incident in a Glasgow car park, which saw him and an unnamed 38-year-old man reported for alleged indecency.
Mr Matheson, 48, admitted to having an affair and cheating on civil partner Stephen Wallace with a man described as a former lover, saying he had not lived up to his own standards.
Yesterday, the council leader was back behind his desk at Glasgow City Chambers. The procurator-fiscal has decided no further action will be taken after concluding there was insufficient evidence that a crime had been committed.
However, on the back of the debacle over the delays and potential scrapping of the £15 million George Square revamp designs, even internal party sources said the incident would continue to overshadow Mr Matheson's leadership.
The SNP used the incident to call into question decisions over which Mr Matheson's leadership has presided, but The Herald understands there is no appetite within the council's Labour administration to oust the leader.
One Labour source said: "Gordon Matheson may have the support of [Scottish Labour leader] Johann Lamont and [shadow Secretary of State for Scotland] Margaret Curran, but privately senior people in the party will be horrified at this.
"He may tough it out and limp on, but this isn't going away for a long time.
"People have been suspended in the Labour group in the city council for less than this."
Another said: "Had this been an election year this could have seriously damaged Labour in Glasgow. There's a lot of social conservatism in the party's heartlands and this won't play well. Labour's closed ranks here but privately a lot of people asking what kind of judgment puts everything at risk for cheap sex in a car?"
Police were informed on December 12 that a passer-by had encountered two men behaving in an inappropriate manner at Linn Park in Cathcart on the city's south side.
Mr Matheson and the other man were spoken to by the police, who then reported them to the procurator-fiscal.
News of the incident broke just as it emerged that the judging panel in the George Square design competition, a personal project of the council leader, were unlikely to pick any of the shortlist of six.
Tory councillor David Meikle said: "Just like the George Square fiasco, this incident shows a total lack of judgment.
"It's now up to Labour to take action as we've seen them do with other councillors. A sex act in public is considerably more serious than what some have been suspended for."
Last night, the SNP said it had no wish to comment on Mr Matheson's private life. A spokesman added: "The issues which are important to the City are Labour's scandalous £500,000 pay-off to a supposed anti-poverty boss, which has been condemned by the Charity Regulator; the closure of day centres for adults with learning disabilities without proper consultation, and their incompetence over plans to redevelop George Square."
Labour's group whip on the council, Alastair Watson, refused to say whether Mr Matheson would even be given a warning.
He said: "This is a private matter and a tragic personal issue for Gordon Matheson. He now needs time and space to get his life in order and sort this out with his partner."
The Labour Party was approached for a comment, but had not responded last night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article