SCOTLAND'S largest local authority has apologised for its handling of a threatened inner-city stone circle, insisting its preferred option is to keep the "mini-Stonehenge" in its current spot.
Glasgow City Council said it recognised the educational value of the Sighthill Stones and its potential as a visitor attraction.
However, while the authority wants it to remain, sources say its future is "in the hands of physics" and if the planned regeneration of Sighthill for Glasgow's 2018 Youth Olympics bid could not work around the structure, it would have to be relocated.
The campaign to save the Sighthill stones – erected in 1979 by astronomer and science writer Duncan Lunan and billed as Britain's first authentically aligned stone circle to have been erected in more than 3000 years – has been gathering momentum since December.
Then, council officials said it was being removed as part of the Youth Olympics bid.
Author and artist Alasdair Gray criticised the plans. Meanwhile, Stuart Braithwaite, guitarist with Scottish rock band Mogwai – whose father helped construct the monument – has attracted support from within the music and arts worlds.
Other backers include Professor John Brown, the Queen's official astronomer to Scotland, and Philip Carr-Gomm, head of the Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids, who has boosted the petition to save the stones to around 3500.
Mr Lunan has met with senior council officials to discuss the future of the structure.
He said: "There's now a recognition of its scientific and historical significance, and of its potential as an educational feature and visitor attraction."
A council spokesman said: "We want these stones to stay in Glasgow, ideally in Sighthill, and we want them to be used as an educational tool.
"We have not properly communicated this before now and we are sorry for that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article