THE sales company at the centre of a row over cash for access to new mothers on Scottish maternity wards has hit back at "commercially motivated" and "inaccurate" attacks by the parenting website Mumsnet.
Last week it emerged NHS Highland could be the first of a series of Scots health boards to end its relationships with Bounty, which describes itself as the "UK's largest parenting club".
Bounty gives new mothers a free pack containing their child benefit form, health advice, product samples and promotions.
Now it has emerged the company is at loggerheads with Mumsnet, which launched a campaign to ban commercial representatives from maternity wards after a survey raised concerns about NHS hospitals allowing private firms to interact directly with patients.
Bounty says Mumsnet is a direct commercial competitor, mainly in advertising, and the survey of 1000 people was discredited because it amounts to a small fraction of the 2000 new mothers they see every day.
Like Bounty, Mumsnet provides access for research purposes to its Parents Panel of thousands of mothers and states that detailed profile data collected is not passed on. Bounty says Mumsnet deals with the same clients as those who choose to use its 37,000-strong Word of Mum Panel.
Clare Goodrham, general manager of Bounty, said: "We are deeply disappointed that, in recent weeks, a competitor, whose users we deeply respect and admire, has made inaccurate claims about Bounty and the practices of our Bounty staff.
"I want to reassure everyone the wellbeing of mums continues to be our number one priority. Bounty is welcomed by 99% of maternity units, and an independent survey by IPSOS-Mori shows 93% of all midwives and heads of midwifery approve of the service provided by Bounty staff, many of whom are mums themselves
"We have no doubt mums will see through the commercially motivated attacks against Bounty."
The poll conducted by Mumsnet found eight out of 10 mothers thought it was unacceptable' for NHS hospitals to allow commercial companies to interact directly with patients on wards.
Bounty pointed out people were asked to complete the survey together with what it considers to be a loaded message: "Hassled by Bounty? Tell us your experience."
A Bounty spokesman said: "The survey is not representative of UK mothers and therefore does not stand up to scrutiny. Of concern as well is the fact that both the framing of the survey on the organisation's website, and some of the questions themselves, are leading.
"They have instigated a highly aggressive social media campaign, eg 237 anti-Bounty tweets over 30 days. Plus their own staff members are tweeting to followers to sign an anti-Bounty petition."
Mumsnet insisted there was strong feeling sales reps should not be on maternity wards, adding: "It's simply not the place for a hard sell."
A spokeswoman for Mumsnet said: "Bounty are a data mining company, which is all well and good but really they shouldn't be doing it on hospital wards. Mumsnet undertakes never to pass on our members' data, so we are really not doing the same thing."
Last month, thousands signed a petition asking UK Health Minister Dr Dan Poulter to outlaw visits from Bounty representatives in hospitals throughout Britain, amid complaints they were cashing in on new parents at a time when mothers were feeling vulnerable.
Last week it emerged that apart from NHS Highland, at least four other Scots NHS health boards including NHS Lothian, NHS Fife, NHS Lanarkshire and NHS Grampian are to reconsider their relationship with Bounty.
However, Scotland's biggest health board, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, says it has no plans to withdraw from Bounty contracts saying the overwhelming feedback from the 16,000 mothers who give birth in the area annually is they enjoy receiving a Bounty bag.
MARTIN WILLIAMS
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article