SCOTLAND needs more universities to help raise the expectations of young people battling challenging backgrounds, one of the UK's top lawyers has claimed.
Former Lord Advocate Dame Elish Angiolini QC, who will be appointed chancellor of the University of the West of Scotland (UWS) tomorrow, said she was in favour of more colleges achieving university status to increase access to higher education.
The Govan-born lawyer said she was proud to be representing a university which was contributing to this ethos and had a "tremendous employability" record.
While acknowledging an increase in university students would put more pressure on the Scottish Government to sustain the provision of fees, she said it was crucial for funds to be safeguarded because universities and colleges were the "powerhouses" of the economy.
She said: "I'm not of the school of thought that there should be fewer universities. It's a recognition of the quality of the work and the nature and the standard of the work.
"There should be more universities, we should have more of our children going. I think that the more of our population that we can educate at a higher level the better for everyone.
"Very few of us when we are born have the potential to go to university.
"It's about how you are nurtured, it's about the opportunities in education, and what we really have to do is make those opportunities as wide as possible."
First Minister Alex Salmond has said the "rocks would melt in the sun" before he would contemplate introducing tuition fees. However, an increase in universities would increase pressure on finances.
Ms Angiolini is currently principal of Saint Hugh's College, Oxford, where she developed of code of governance for higher education. She is also a visiting professor in law at Strathclyde University and developed a new college to improve the skills of prosecutors.
As chancellor of UWS, which was created in 2008 after a series of mergers, she will represent the institution at the highest level and will have powers to award academic qualifications.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article