A EURO MP would probably have to resign if they paid taxpayers' money to their wife and a former mistress for work not done, Nigel Farage has said.
The UK Independence Party leader again denied claims made in the European Parliament that he had an affair with his spokeswoman Annabelle Fuller.
MEP Nikki Sinclaire, who left the party after a row with Mr Farage, used parliamentary privilege to accuse the Ukip leader of using his secretarial allowance to employ his wife Kirsten and his "former mistress" Ms Fuller. Ms Fuller said she had been "hounded by the press with these false allegations since 2006".
Speaking on BBC One's Sunday Politics show, Mr Farage claimed the Tories were behind attacks on his party. Asked if he denied he employed a former mistress, south east MEP Mr Farage said: "Yes... if you actually look at that allegation and you look at many of the other things that have been said over the course of the last week, I think it's becoming pretty clear to voters that the Establishment are now terrified of Ukip and they will use whatever little helpers they can find to try and do us down in public."
Questioned if it would be a resigning matter for any MEP to employ his wife -having said they would not -and also a former mistress on the European payroll, Mr Farage said: "It would probably be a resigning matter, particularly if the assumption was money was being taken for work that wasn't being done."
Asked if the Conservatives were behind the stories, Mr Farage said: "Yes it is and they're obsessed with the idea... that all our voters are retired half colonels living in Wiltshire. It just isn't the case. We're certainly getting a kicking from Tory supporters and we get some from the Labour side today."
Mr Farage said earlier: "I didn't employ any family member for years. So, in fact, what happened was my wife finished up doing the job completely unpaid for the first seven years of my job."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article