THE director general of the Confederation of British Industry has claimed that the case for Scottish independence does not stack up and the best way to retain jobs and prosperity is within the Union.
John Cridland's comments provoked a strong response from the Scottish Government on a day when the Cabinet met in Irvine, North Ayrshire.
It coincided with a string of investment announcements amounting to £9 million, mainly through the expansion of oil and gas service company Howco Group.
First Minister Alex Salmond said: "Regeneration isn't just about businesses, it's about people and places, creating communities we can be proud of, where people want to live, work and invest in."
However, Mr Cridland said: "The minute you draw a line between Gretna and Berwick, Scotland starts to drift apart from its biggest market and loses a significant amount of economic clout.
"The economic plan outlined in the White Paper does not add up. It ignores the need for deficit reduction, instead promising more unfunded spending.
"On the key issues that are critical to jobs and growth, the White Paper's lack of clarity runs the risk of jeopardising an independent Scotland's future success.
"Scotland's economy is a real success story as part of the UK - it has the independence and flexibility of devolution alongside the support of the Union."
He added: "The fate of Scotland is, of course, a decision for the Scottish people, but business is clear - we are stronger together."
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was scathing of the claims and said: "The CBI opposed devolution using many similar arguments, which have since been proven to be completely and comprehensively wrong.
"Unfortunately, this paper misrepresents the realities of independence in several key respects - an independent Scotland will still enjoy barrier-free trade with the rest of the UK and the only serious threat to our membership of the EU is Westminster's proposed in-out referendum."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article