A FATHER'S last words to his teenage daughter were to "be careful and watch herself", a murder trial has heard.
Jack Doyle, who has since died, spoke to police hours after the naked body of his daughter, Elaine, 16, was found in a lane just yards from her Greenock home almost 28 years ago.
He told them her bed was not slept in and he knew "deep down" that early-morning police activity that day might have something to do with his daughter.
John Docherty, 49, of Hunters' Quay Holiday Village, Dunoon, is on trial accused of murdering Elaine. He says that at the time he is alleged to have stripped and strangled the girl he was at home with his parents, also now dead.
Mr Doyle's statement was read to the High Court in Edinburgh during the evidence of retired detective inspector James Goldie, 76, who broke the news that Elaine's body had been found on June 2, 1986.
Mr Doyle had said although Elaine never stayed out all night without telling her parents he had called police once before when she had not turned up on time.
She was brought home in a police car by officers who said she had been found talking to a boy and they said: "The boy is a baddy and not suitable for Elaine."
Mr Doyle described how his daughter got dressed up the day before her body was found and he thought she was going to a disco.
She left her home in Ardgowan Street to meet a friend, Lynn Ryan, but phoned her father later.
"She said she would be home between 12.30am and 1am. I told her to be careful and watch herself," said the statement.
Mr Doyle, who was 44 at the time, said he woke at 5am - the time he usually got up for work - and saw Elaine's bed was empty. He wanted to call Lynn's parents but his wife, Maureen, said it was too early.
"Shortly afterwards I went to the window and saw all the police activity. My wife said: 'It is something to do with Elaine'. I tried to re-assure her but deep down I knew it could be."
In the statement Mr Doyle said: "As far as I knew she didn't have a steady boyfriend. She was a very loving girl towards me."
He said Elaine had told him: "I will never get married. I am staying with you, Dad."
Cross-examining witnesses, defence QC Donald Findlay suggested the investigation into Elaine's death was "botched".
Retired chief superintendent George Nedley, 52, agreed that in 1986 police investigations were carried out differently because there had been "a quantum leap" in forensic science since then. "We know so much more now than we did then," he told Mr Findlay.
The lawyer asked if the way the crime scene was handled was "shoddy". Mr Nedley replied: "No, there was nobody went out deliberately not to do their job."
Mr Findlay said that a video taken in Ardgowan Street showed detectives wandering about picking things up and putting them down again. Elaine's body was moved and turned over. Mr Findlay continued: "It is very important for the ladies and gentlemen of the jury to have a clear picture of the way, for example, a police investigation was carried out in 1986.
"Things such as police officers tramping in and out of the crime scene - one suspects more or less just to have a look in some cases - would not in any way be tolerated by today's standards.
"Such a casual approach runs the risk of contaminating a crime scene, or de-contaminating a crime scene, destroying evidence."
Mr Docherty denies murder and has lodged a special defence of incrimination suggesting the culprit might be found on a list of 41 names in police files on the investigation into Elaine's death.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article