David Cameron has defended his use of the word "muppets" to describe Labour leader Ed Miliband and shadow chancellor Ed Balls during debate in the House of Commons.
Mr Cameron used the word during a furious exchange at Prime Minister's Questions over the part-privatisation of the Royal Mail, during which Mr Miliband branded him "the dunce of Downing Street" and accused him of selling off the company at "mates' rates" to his friends in the City of London.
"Muppets" is not banned as unparliamentary by the Commons rulebook, Erskine May, and Speaker John Bercow made no comment on its use by the Prime Minister, but its deployment in the chamber raised the eyebrows of some at Westminster.
Appearing on television, Mr Cameron insisted the word was "not inappropriate".
"These are spirited exchanges," he said. "I think the language in the House of Commons, where there is a lot of banter ... I don't think that's inappropriate."
Mr Miliband challenged the Prime Minister to explain why part of the Royal Mail had been sold at a price £1.4 billion lower than its current valuation.
Mr Cameron said: "The case I was making was that Britain has benefited from the sale of Royal Mail to the tune of £2 billion - money that Labour never would have achieved because they never managed to privatise that business."
He said he was not willing to accept accusations over the sale from "the people who advised Gordon Brown about selling Britain's gold and losing £9 billion".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article