FORMER opposition leader Abdullah Abdullah was leading after the first official results from Afghanistan's presidential election were announced, but recorded incidents of serious fraud exceed figures for 2009, when more than a million suspect votes were thrown out.
Initial results based on 10% of the vote from 26 out of 34 provinces showed Abdullah in the lead with 41.9%, the Independent Election Commission said, while Western-leaning Ashraf Ghani came second with 37.6%. A third candidate, running with the backing of President Hamid Karzai's brothers, had 9.8%.
"I want to make clear that the results could change in future, as we announce the results with additional percentages of the vote and this is not the final result," said the chairman of the election commission, Ahmad Yousuf Nuristani.
Afghanistan's allies praised the April 5 vote as a success because of the high turnout, estimated at 60% of 12 million eligible votes, and the failure of Taliban militants to stage high-profile attacks on the day.
But evidence of widespread fraud could undermine the legitimacy of an election meant to usher in Afghanistan's first democratic transfer of power, as incumbent Hamid Karzai prepares to step down after more than 12 years in power, and as Western forces prepare to leave.
The election complaints body hinted it might need more time to investigate all of the complaints. Final results are due on May 14.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article