PLANS to declare independence on March 24 2016, if Scotland votes Yes may have to be dropped in case negotiations to join the EU faced delays, a leading pro-European body has warned.
The European Movement, Scotland's oldest dedicated pro-European grouping, said in report for MSPs that it was unlikely that an independent Scotland's application would be blocked.
However, it warned political will would be "paramount," particularly in talks to secure a share of the UK's valuable budget rebate.
The report, submitted as part of a Holyrood inquiry into an independent Scotland's membership of the EU, added: "The 18 month timetable is vulnerable to delaying tactics and the political context in which negotiation would take place will be highly dynamic.
"If this period is extended, this could cause disruption, more so in the case of a new application.
"A potential counter measure to avoid hiatus and improve Scotland's position while negotiating is to leave open the date of formal separation."
First Minister Alex Salmond has signalled his intention to declare independence on March 24, 2016, ahead of the next Scottish Parliament elections.
He has argued the timetable would allow sufficient time for talks to divide up the UK's assets and debts and join international bodies such as the EU.
Scottish Liberal Democrat MEP George Lyon said: "As part of the UK, Scotland benefits at the EU from things like a share of the big UK budget rebate, key opt-outs on the euro and control over our borders.
"People would not want to see this special treatment frittered away as the cost of securing a quick settlement in Brussels in the event of a Yes vote.
"The European movement has no particular referendum axe to grind and they are simply restating what many experts have already told us: that the SNP's independence timetable in the event of a vote to leave the UK is not realistic."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article