The head of an international mission to Syria charged with destroying the country's chemical weapons has called on President Bashar Assad's government to ensure it meets a deadline to destroy all its toxic chemicals.
Sigrid Kaag, of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, told reporters in Damascus that 92.5% of Syria's chemical materials had been removed from the country and destroyed.
She described it as "significant progress," though she said the government needs to ensure the remaining materials are eradicated by the end of the month.
"It's important that the last push is made toward full completion," Ms Kaag said.
Syria missed an April 13 deadline to destroy all its chemical weapons in accessible locations. International experts say that could have a serious impact on making a June 30 deadline for the removal of all its chemical weapons.
"An important (achievement) has been made in permanently closing down production facilities," Ms Kaag said, adding it came in "a very short period of time and under difficult and challenging security conditions".
However, experts have not had access to 12 chemical weapons production facilities yet, Ms Kaag said.
The international community aims to remove and destroy 1300 metric tons of chemicals Syria stockpiled to turn into poison gas and nerve agents.
The effort was sparked by a chemical weapons attack near Damascus on August 21 last year that killed hundreds of people. The attacks were blamed on Assad's government and brought the United States to the brink of military intervention in Syria. Damascus denied involvement.
Recently, activists have accused government forces of attacking rebel-held areas with poisonous chlorine gas, a charge the regime denies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article