UKIP Scotland's civil war has erupted again after its top European election candidate admitted the party suffered from "petty, childish, egotistical, internal bitching".
Leaked emails also show David Coburn claiming some colleagues would not support him even if he turned water into Malt whisky.
Ukip leader Nigel Farage's high profile has given the party in Scotland a chance of picking up a seat in this month's European election. However, Coburn, who is the number one candidate on the Ukip Scotland list, is struggling to contain a vicious round of infighting.
Six of the nine candidates who fought for top billing on the Ukip list quit following allegations of unfairness in the contest.
The row led to Farage sacking Scottish party leader Lord Monckton and triggered the resignation of Mike Scott Hayward as chairman.
Another party stalwart, Paul Henke, was suspended for 100 years during the fallout, a sanction eventually overturned by a court.
Although the European poll is less than three weeks away, Coburn is still struggling to keep the divisions in check.
Senior Ukip figure Donald Gatt emailed him days ago to complain about the lack of information about the campaign.
Coburn responded: "We were all under the impression from your twitter feed and your other unhelpful remarks, including criticism of the candidate during an election, that you were disinterested in campaigning for Ukip."
Gatt stated that he disagreed with Coburn's "undemocratic appointment as candidate" but insisted he supported Ukip's objectives. Coburn replied: "If I walked across the surface of the Clyde while simultaneously turning water into Malt whisky, you and your chums would still find fault in me, so why should I waste my extremely limited time?"
After pointing to favourable polling, Coburn blasted: "This would suggest Ukip will get one and who knows perhaps 2 seats in Scotland which, quite frankly, is the object of the exercise rather than petty, childish, egotistical, internal bitching".
Coburn did not return the Sunday Herald's call.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article