DISCUSSIONS about potential new drugs for NHS patients have been held in public for the first time, despite a last-minute attempt to vet reporting.
The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) described opening the doors on their monthly deliberations in Glasgow yesterday as a demonstration of openness and transparency.
But guidelines issued less than 24 hours earlier had banned onlookers from directly or indirectly quoting anyone present without their clear permission.
Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw warned of frogmarching people through an "SMC censorship committee".
Professor Jonathan Fox, SMC chairman, started proceedings with a policy U-turn. A statement issued later said: "The chair of the SMC today made members of the committee aware that this is a public meeting and everything said by members can be quoted publicly after the meeting.
"Although the current guidance we've issued discourages this, it is impossible and inappropriate for us to tell attendees not to quote directly from the meeting. We will amend the guidance shortly."
The SMC agreed to hold public meetings after this was recommended by a Scottish Government review probing criticisms about access to new medicines.
Under the new regime, 20 spaces have been made for the public at the monthly meetings and people have to register in advance to attend. Documents summing up the information about the drugs being discussed are available on the day, but cannot be taken out of the meeting room.
Members vote on whether drugs should be accepted through a secret ballot and the final decision is made in four weeks - a time frame that may be shortened in future.
Among those present was campaigner Ali Stunt, who has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. She said: "It is a really positive move to allow the public in because it is something that is going to help take away some of the mystique"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article