THE chief executive of Pfizer has admitted job cuts were to be expected as "part of being efficient" but he could not specify where in the world the axe would fall in the event of the US drugs giant taking over AstraZeneca.
Forfar-born Ian Read, who has been with the company for more than 35 years, was speaking as he was grilled by MPs yesterday about the proposed £62.9 billion merger and the impact it would have on the future of research and development spending.
Mr Read told the Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee: "I do not expect the combined total will remain the same. I expect it will be lower, to what extent I cannot be specific."
His remarks are likely to add to concerns about the deal after politicians and unions expressed worries that it would lead to job cuts and damage the UK's position as a hub for research and development (R&D).
Mr Read wrote to David Cameron earlier this month outlining a series of promises should the transaction go through, including a commitment to AstraZeneca's planned R&D hub in Cambridge. The firm also said that 20 per cent of the post-merger R&D workforce of the newly-formed pharmaceutical giant would be in the UK.
Mr Read told MPs that he could not specify which country the cuts in R&D spending would fall in if the deal with the British firm went ahead. But he said in response to UK Government concerns "we made commitments that are unprecedented, that I don't think any company has ever made prior to an acquisition".
He added: "Those commitments are legally binding, not just for one year but for five . . . I am here today to make those commitments."
Sir Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, wrote to the committee to express his concerns that Pfizer's commitments were vague and that a five-year pledge on research and jobs is insufficient.
AstraZeneca said in written evidence to the committee that while it had benefited itself from mergers - it was formed from a UK-Swedish tie-up in 1999 - it believed "excessive consolidation" would undermine research as well as science skills.
Pfizer wants to create a new pharmaceuticals giant that will be domiciled for tax purposes in the UK but will cut back on the current combined £7 billion research budget of the two firms. The unions want Business Secretary Vince Cable to intervene to block any takeover.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article