UKIP'S showing in Scotland lagged a long way behind its performance across the rest of the Britain.
But securing its first seat in any Scottish election was remarkable.
The party's 10.4 per cent of the vote was exactly double their share in the 2009 European Parliament election and in recent Holyrood by-elections the party has failed even to match that. Last June, in Aberdeen Donside, it claimed 4.8 per cent of the vote and in the contest for Cowdenbeath earlier this year it slipped to 3 per cent.
Even then, though, it was a mistake to assume Ukip was somehow an exclusively English phenomenon. With little organisation and hardly any activists on the ground, the party was still beating the Greens and Lib Dems in those by-elections. What's more, as a poll last week showed, a majority of Scots backed Ukip policies to curb immigration, cut foreign aid and crack down on benefits, if the word Ukip was mentioned.
Alex Salmond claimed the party had been boosted by "the wall-to-wall media coverage of Ukip that has been beamed into Scotland". However, the First Minister was guilty of making Ukip the story with his attacks on the "nasty politics" of Nigel Farage.
Mr Salmond gambled on the SNP winning a third seat and holding off the Ukip challenge. Such a result, he believed, would underline the chasm between a right-lurching England and left-of-centre Scotland.
In fact, despite an army of footsoldiers knocking on doors, the SNP's share of the vote fell back slightly from 2009 and, with Ukip grabbing the final Scottish seat, the First Minister's argument is less convincing.
The pro-UK parties have made much of this but it's hard to see their portrayal of the SNP and Ukip as part of a pan-European rise in nationalism lodging itself in the public mind either.
Given Ukip's limitless capacity for gaffes, they might also be wary of Nigel Farage's promise to become more involved in the independence debate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article