RICHARD III was not the "bunch-backed toad" described by Shakespeare and was hardly affected by his famous deformity, a study has shown.
Scientists who carried out scans of the King's spine found it had a "well balanced curve" that could have been concealed under clothes or custom-made armour.
Unlike the hunchback depictions seen on stage and screen, his head and neck would have been straight, not tilted, and there is no evidence he had a limp.
The findings are backed by accounts written during Richard III's lifetime which describe him as "comely enough" and "handsome".
A skeleton found under a Leicester car park in 2012 was confirmed as the king's last year after DNA testing.
In the new study, experts carried out a 3D reconstruction of the spine which showed 65 to 85 degrees of scoliosis, or bending, to the right. It was also twisted into a spiral shape. But despite having one shoulder slightly higher than the other and a short trunk compared with his arms and legs, the defects would not have handicapped the him too much.
Dr Phil Stone, chairman of the Richard III Society, said: "Examination of Richard III's remains shows he had a scoliosis, thus confirming the Shakespearean description of a 'bunch-backed toad' is a complete fabrication."
For the study, published in The Lancet medical journal, CT scans of the bones and a 3D printer were used to create a plastic model of the spine.
Dr Jo Appleby, from Leicester University, who led the research, said: "Although the scoliosis looks dramatic, it probably did not cause a major physical deformity.
"A curve of 65-85 would not have prevented Richard from being an active individual."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article