WOMEN'S health is being increasingly threatened by the "over-medicalisation" of pregnancy, according to a new report.
Routine use of unnecessary interventions, including Caesarean section, cutting to facilitate childbirth and restrictions on movement during labour, can have lasting effects on mothers and babies.
According to a series of papers in The Lancet journal, the risks exist in both poorer parts of the world and in high-income countries such as the UK
The researchers say increasing the number of independent midwife units would halve the number of maternal deaths while also reducing unnecessary controversial medical interventions.
Caesarean sections in Scotland have been increasing steadily, to more than one quarter (27.8 per cent) of births in for the year to March 2012. It means more than 16,000 babies were born by C-section in that year.
The papers' authors say that "over-medicalisation" has become an issue, not just for high-income nations but also more deprived countries, which also suffer from a lack of effective midwifery.
Professor Caroline Homer, one of the researchers from the University of Technology in Sydney, Australia, said: "Both under-use and over-use of medical interventions in pregnancy contribute to short and long-term illness for an estimated 20 million child-bearing women [worldwide].
"This not only effects their health and wellbeing, but may also result in their needing to pay for ongoing health-care costs, and on the ability of their families to escape poverty."
In high-income countries, midwife-led units in, or next to, hospitals were better at encouraging natural births and lower levels of hormone treatment, assisted birth, Caesarean birth and vaginal cutting than conventional labour wards, evidence showed. There was no difference in infant outcomes between the two.
Independent midwife care also appeared to have important benefits, according to one Danish study, including reduced maternal ill-health and an increased likelihood of spontaneous birth.
Each year, an estimated 139 million births take place around the world, and almost 300,000 women die during pregnancy, say experts. They estimate that if midwifery coverage increased by just one quarter, the current rate of maternal deaths could be halved by 2030.
Professor Mary Renfrew, an author from the School of Nursing and Midwifery at the University of Dundee, said: "Many of the needs of childbearing women, their babies, and families across the world are still not being met, despite long-standing recognition that women and their babies need access to health care which provides more than just emergency interventions for acute medical problems.
"Although midwifery is already widely acknowledged as making a vital and cost-effective contribution to high-quality maternal and newborn care in many countries, its potential social, economic and health benefits are far from being realised on a global scale."
Cathy Warwick, chief executive of the Royal College of Midwives (RCM), said: "This is a vital report not only for countries where a reduction in maternal and neonatal mortality remains a significant challenge, but also for developed and high income countries.
"Most importantly, the authors, having examined what women and babies need, conclude that we will not make enough progress in improving the care of women and babies if we continue to focus on one-off interventions to save lives. Instead, we must offer a package of midwifery care.
"Very importantly, the authors emphasise the need to avoid unnecessary interventions in childbirth, a position the RCM has been advocating and promoting for some time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article