Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone has declared himself "a bit of an idiot" for paying a £60million settlement to bring an end to his bribery trial.
Back at work in his office in London just hours after walking out of the district court in Munich for the final time, and in the words of a court official "a free man", Ecclestone made his honest admission.
Although Ecclestone had long declared his determination to prove his innocence after being charged with bribery of a German banker and incitement to breach of trust, in the end the trial was proving a strain on his personal life and his businesses.
Over the past week Ecclestone's lawyers and state prosecutors have thrashed out terms whereby the 83-year-old now has seven days to pay a sum of 100m US dollars (£60m), believed to be a record in German judiciary history.
Under Bavarian state law, a trial of the nature of Ecclestone's can be concluded if the accused makes a payment to a non-profit making organisation, or the treasury.
Such an offer, however, does not imply any guilt on behalf of the accused.
Gallingly for Ecclestone, if the trial had run its course through to October, in all likelihood he would have been acquitted.
In summation, after deliberating for three hours on the offer made by the defence and agreed by the prosecution, presiding judge Peter Noll declared: "The charges could not, in important areas, be substantiated."
Although slightly lighter in the pocket, given Ecclestone's worth is estimated at around £3-4billion, he was nonetheless relieved as he discussed a period of his life finally behind him.
Speaking to Press Association Sport, Ecclestone said: "The bottom line is it's been three-and-a-half years of aggravation, travelling, meeting lawyers, and God knows what else, so it is good it is out of the way.
"This trial has been going on for two days a week and it was going to go on until October.
"When you're trying to run businesses it's not easy trying to resolve things when you're dealing with lawyers.
"In the end what has happened today is good and bad - the good is the judge more or less said I was acquitted, and they (the prosecution) really didn't have a case.
"So I was a bit of an idiot to do what I did to settle because it wasn't with the judge, it was with the prosecutors.
"Anyway, it's done and finished, so it's all right. I'm contented, it's all fine.
"This now allows me to do what I do best, which is running F1.
"Another three months out would have been bad. I've been working weekends to catch up with what I've been missing during the week.
"I've not really noticed, but it's probably taken its toll a little bit."
Prior to the trial commencing back in April, Ecclestone had faced the prospect of a 10-year prison sentence if found guilty.
But to add to Noll's remarks, court spokeswoman Andrea Titz stated that based on the evidence presented "the court did not consider a conviction overwhelmingly likely from the present point of view".
In 2006, German regional bank BayernLB sold their 47.2 per cent stake in F1 to private equity firm, and the current majority shareholders, CVC Capital Partners.
Prosecutors claim Ecclestone paid Gerhard Gribkowsky, formerly the chief risk officer of BayernLB, a bribe of 44m US dollars (£26m) to steer the sale to CVC.
Ecclestone has long maintained his innocence, claiming he was "shaken down" by Gribkowsky who was threatening to inform HM Revenue & Customs he controlled an offshore family trust known as Bambino Holdings.
Although Ecclestone has continually insisted the trust is not in his name, if an investigation had uncovered to the contrary he would have been liable for a tax bill of around £2billion.
Two years ago Gribkowsky was jailed for eight-and-a-half years after he was convicted of tax evasion, bribery and breach of fiduciary duty.
With the trial running for just over three months, last Tuesday it was suspended after Ecclestone made an initial offer.
Lengthy negotiations followed before the settlement was reached, with 99m dollars going directly to the German state, with the remainder to a German charity that looks after terminally-ill children.
As for Ecclestone, who had been warned a guilty verdict, regardless of whether he avoided a prison sentence, would have resulted in his dismissal as chief executive, now resumes his F1 duties.
In January, to alleviate his workload with the trial then looming, he agreed to stand down from a number of directorial positions on companies related to F1, including the main board.
Now, Ecclestone said: "I stood down for obvious reasons, but I'll be back on again now. Everything is back to normal."
Asked whether CVC were happy for him to continue, his answer was unequivocal as he said: "Yes, of course."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article