My verdict: two stars.
A gig that begins with a funny turn before the show has even started doesn't bode well for the rest of the night. But by the end it seems clear it was probably some prophetic reaction of what was to come, rather than an extreme bout of vertigo.
There's a theory that you're either a Strictly person or a Dancing on Ice person - or that's what I'm led to believe from a straw poll of my Saturday night TV watching pals, anyway.
For me, it comes down to the danger aspect.
Strictly cannot promise the very real possibility of someone scalping themselves with their own ice skate on live TV. Or that Todd Carty will career off a rink completely out of control via the fire exit. But it has a huge following, so it must be me that's in the wrong.
TV and radio veteran Zoe Ball hosts Strictly at the Hydro, which adopts the premise of the Saturday night programme where dancers and celebs compete against each other. The audience gets to vote for which of their favourite couples they think should win, and are charged for the pleasure of doing so.
The judging panel, which usually boasts Farmfoods-enthusiast Len Goodman among others, is comprised tonight of original judge Craig Revel Horwood, previous winner Tom Chambers, and pro dancer Camilla Dallerup, who in particular displays all the warmth and charisma of a dead shrew.
As per the television version, some celebs are better than others. TV personality and Strictly '14 alumni Mark Wright wields his partner Karen across the floor by her leg during their ballroom dance. I am put in mind of how I treat my Henry Hoover when my partner hasn't vacuumed the living room in weeks. It is a glorious thing to watch if you love cleaning angrily to Sade.
It helps if each couple have a good tune to perform to. Simon Webbe of boyband Blue dances dramatically to 'Roxanne' and creates an atmospheric experience unlike anything that succeeds it. He has snake hips, or something.
Radio 1 presenter Scott Mills is dressed as Sebastian the crab from The Little Mermaid and stumbles around to Under The Sea flanked by two professional dancers going tonto in bright chinos and fish heads. An accidental triumph and the crowd (and I) love it.
The magic of two people moving together, however skilfully, is lost in this overblown format though. The Hydro is too big to catch the nuances of '14 winner Caroline Flack's intricate footwork which we know is evident from seeing her on TV. At the Hydro we are forced to watch the couples from the screens and we can do that at home.
The stage feels like a big empty Monopoly board without enough players to fill it. And talking of games, it's possible to play Scottish stereotype bingo with the vast number of references made by the performers and host during the course of the night.
Thom Evans compared to a haggis? Zoe Ball admitting she scarfed a Tunnocks tea cake and a caramel bar during the break? Scott Mills in a see-you Jimmy hat? To paraphrase a term of our own: geez peace.
It is worth retouching on the fact in the interest of impartiality that your reviewer was seated in the highest echelons of the Hydro, where the steel spaghetti junction of lights and supporting structures form a huge Independence Day-style alien spaceship above the crowd.
Your reviewer may or may not have had a had a major wobbly when first seated thanks to the disorientating concrete sheerness of the Hydro's design which may or may not have influenced in some small way her enjoyment of the show.
But it's not the show's fault that the Hydro is panic-attack-inducing high. We cannot blame it for that.
I'd wager that Strictly Live is empty and flawed enough to make non-fans weep and clutch their significant other in fright all by itself.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article