Only two of 10 men supposedly jailed for the attempted assassination of teenage activist Malala Yousafzai have actually been convicted during the secret trial, it has been alleged.
Eight men have escaped justice following the court case, despite all 10 supposedly being given a 25-year sentence, according to reports.
A senior security source in Pakistan accused officials of lying over the trial and convictions and claimed the eight were released "quietly, to avoid a media fuss".
A source said: "The trial had absolutely no credibility as nobody was there to witness it but a public prosecutor, a judge, the army and the accused.
"This was a tactic to get the media pressure away from the Malala case because the whole world wanted convictions for the crime."
Malala was shot in the head by the Pakistani Taliban in the Swat Valley on October 9 2012 for advocating education for women.
The 17-year-old won world acclaim for her campaign and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last year.
Pakistan's military arrested the men last year.
Malala was initially treated in Pakistan, but was later flown to a hospital in Britain, where she now lives with her family.
Public prosecutor Sayed Naeem said in April that each defendant got 25 years in jail.
He said: "It is life in prison for the 10 militants who were tried by an anti-terrorist court."
A spokesman for Malala was unavailable for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article