Chancellor George Osborne has voiced Britain's concern over a jailed academic as he visited a remote Chinese province at the centre of allegations of human rights violations.
But the Chancellor rejected suggestions that his visit to Xinjiang province was an effective endorsement of China's treatment of its Uighur ethnic minority, insisting that it was right for him to engage with Beijing on deepening economic and financial ties.
He is hoping to help win British firms a slice of the economic benefits resulting from President Xi Jinping's ambitious plans to link China with Europe via a "new Silk Road" running through Xinjiang.
Mr Osborne's arrival in provincial capital Urumqi came as reports emerged of clashes between separatists and security forces which left a reported 40 dead or injured. Local reports said that the violence occurred after alleged separatists launched a knife attack at a colliery in Aksu, western Xinjiang, killing five police.
Speaking as he visited businesses in Urumqi, Mr Osborne said full details of the incident had not yet been received, but added: "Obviously if people have been injured or indeed killed, that's a tragedy and our sympathy is with the victims and their families.
"We never condone violence whatever the cause, we always seek a peaceful resolution of disputes and we hope that peaceful resolution can be arrived at."
As he became the first British government minister to visit Xinjiang, Mr Osborne has come under pressure from human rights groups to raise the case of Ilham Tohti, a Uighur intellectual given a life sentence last September for alleged separatism.
Amnesty International's UK director Kate Allen said a failure to raise his case with the Chinese authorities would "send the signal that the UK is willing to compromise its human rights values".
Ms Allen called on the Chancellor to press the Chinese government to end "the widespread discrimination Uighurs face, including in employment, education, housing and the severe restrictions on religious freedom".
Speaking to British reporters in Urumqi, Mr Osborne said he had not yet spoken to local authorities in Xinjiang. But he added: "Our concerns about the Tohti case are well known and we have made them very public.
"I have raised the human rights concerns that we have with the Chinese authorities as part of the broader conversation."
But he stressed that the main purpose of his visit was economic, with a new target to make China the second-largest destination for British exports by 2020. He insisted there was no contradiction between seeking closer economic ties with China and upholding Britain's democratic values.
"I think it would be very strange if Britain's only relationship with one-fifth of the world's population and the government that represents them would be solely about human rights," said the Chancellor.
"It doesn't mean we don't stand up for our values, but ultimately a big part of our values is economic freedom. Giving people more control over their own lives in terms of the economic affairs leads in turn to greater personal freedom."
Mr Osborne visited Xinjiang-based Hualing Industry and Trade Group, which has announced plans for investment in major property projects with a total value of £1.2 billion in Manchester, Leeds and Sheffield.
Britain's exports to China have increased fivefold since 2003 and the country has risen from ninth to sixth place in the global table of destinations for UK goods and services. But Mr Osborne said the UK must "raise its game" and increase exports from £25 billion to £30 billion by 2030 to make China its second largest market behind the US.
Treasury officials acknowledged the target - part of a government drive to increase total UK exports to £1 trillion a year - was ambitious, but said it chimed with China's position as the world's second largest economy in GDP terms.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel