MINISTERS have been accused of "lax oversight" after it emerged that 14 college principals shared nearly £2.4 million in pay-outs under a controversial national merger scheme.
John Doyle, the former principal of Coatbridge College, received the next highest payment of £304,000 - a package which is currently under scrutiny from Holyrood's public audit committee following concerns of poor governance.
Tavish Scott, education spokesman for the Scottish Liberal Democrats, raised concerns over ministers’ awareness of the scale of severance payments.
He said: "These payouts symbolise just how badly the merger process was planned and scrutinised by the Scottish Government.
"It is incredibly concerning that the Cabinet Secretary has admitted there would have been regular contact between her, her predecessor and the Scottish Funding Council, but that concerns over the scale of these payouts were not raised sooner.
"The severance payment made to Mr Doyle was by no means unique and certainly not the cheapest and it has become very clear that it is highly unlikely that this money can be returned."
Mr Scott's comments came after the public audit committee questioned Mr Doyle as well as former chairman of the college board John Gray and Angela Constance, the Education Secretary.
Ms Constance told the committee she wanted Mr Doyle to pay the money back, but said she did not think there was a "mechanism" that would enable that to happen.
She said: "I'm appalled at the poor governance and the lack of stewardship. If I could I would rewind to ensure that payments in excess of £300,000, which were completely exorbitant, were not met from the public purse.
"Of course I would want Mr Doyle to pay back money that he has received at the expense of the public purse. Whether there is a mechanism to do that is another matter."
She said a college governance taskforce which she chairs is currently working to ensure there is no repetition of the issue and to improve wider accountability and governance.
Caroline Gardner, the Auditor General for Scotland, has already criticised the severance packages paid out to the seven managers in a report in June, saying there were "serious weaknesses in governance".
However, the former principal and board chairman John Gray were recalled to give further evidence after he was accused of "talking nonsense" to MSPs.
Mr Doyle again defended his position, saying he was losing a job he loved and was very successful in along with five years' salary.
"I lost my job through no fault of my own. I feel, in the context of an employee, let down, and I feel as a principal and chief executive that we could have done things better. There is no reason for me to pay the money back."
Asked if he had exercised his duty of care towards other staff at the college, Mr Doyle answered: "Unequivocally, yes."
Mr Gray said the payments had to be viewed in the context of the college merger process arguing that the merger policy brought in by the Scottish Government had provided "very little direction" over how it should be managed.
John Gray at the public audit committee
He also criticised the auditor general's report, saying Ms Gardner had "clearly not examined the situation in sufficient detail", noting that neither he nor Mr Doyle had been approached for an explanation.
He said: "The auditor general's statement had no foundation in fact, her conclusions were entirely her own and were insulting and damaging, and should be retracted."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel