Talk about scoring an own goal.
David Cameron's call to Conservative MPs not to go through the division lobbies with Labour MPs, whom he described as a "bunch of terrorist sympathisers", was a terrible mistake even if Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond sprang to the Prime Minister's defence this morning.
As the debate got under way, Mr Cameron hit the right tone in the Commons having clearly got carried away at his meeting with Tory 1922 committee backbenchers.
Yet, in this battle for hearts and minds, his key audience is not his Conservative chums - we expect only around a dozen not to support the UK Government motion - but Labour MPs, some of whom are still undecided faced with such a major, complicated issue.
Jeremy Corbyn and his loyal lieutenants have been trying to persuade swithering colleagues to vote against extending airstrikes. They claim, and I think rightly, that some of them are drifting towards the No camp.
The Labour leader condemned Mr Cameron's outburst as a "desperate slur" which demeaned his office, which, in the circumstances, few could disagree with. Senior Tories were out desperately trying to limit the damage.
The Foreign Secretary insisted the PM's remarks were not aimed at long-standing opponents of war like Mr Corbyn, whose views he said were "obviously sincerely held".
But Mr Cameron's outburst has added some extra political spice to a marathon debate that will be heated and passionate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel